Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Modify Aykrod Formula, ensure a decent living wage under 8th CPC

Modify Aykrod Formula, ensure a decent living wage under 8th CPC

Bruhaspati Samal

General Secretary 

Confederation of Central Govt Employees and Workers 

Odisha State CoC, Bhubaneswar 


The recent declaration of the 8th Central Pay Commission (CPC) by the Government on January 16, 2025, has reignited discussions on the pressing need to revise the outdated wage determination criteria in India. In response to the Government's request for suggestions on the proposed Terms of Reference for the CPC, the National Council–Joint Consultative Machinery (NCJCM) (Staff Side) submitted its recommendations on February 3, 2025. A crucial meeting was subsequently held on February 10, 2025, where the NCJCM Staff Side strongly advocated for modifications to the Dr. Aykrod Formula, which has been the foundation for determining minimum wages in India since its adoption by the 15th Indian Labour Conference in 1957.

One of the key issues raised by the Staff Side is the need to expand the family size considered under the Dr. Aykrod Formula. Currently, the formula calculates the minimum wage based on a family of three Consumption Units (CUs)—comprising an employee (1 CU), a spouse (0.8 CU), and two children (0.6 CU each). However, in light of contemporary social and legal considerations, the Staff Side has urged for an expansion to five CUs to include the employee's dependent parents (1 CU each). This demand aligns with the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007, which establishes the moral and legal responsibility of wage earners to support their aging parents. Additionally, under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973, neglecting aged parents is considered an offense. The Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, also emphasizes the duty of children to provide for their parents. The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and various central government rules further recognize dependent parents as part of the family, reinforcing the legitimacy of their inclusion in wage calculations. Above all, the Central Civil Services (Conduct), Rules, 1964 include the dependent parents of the Government employee in the definition of family for the purpose of availing Leave Travel Concession (LTC), Medical Treatment etc. The expansion of the Dr. Aykrod Formula to five CUs is essential to ensuring financial security for elderly parents who often face neglect and economic hardships.

It is an unfortunate reality that a significant number of elderly parents in India suffer from financial neglect despite their sacrifices for their children. Reports indicate that nearly 40% of senior citizens in India face economic hardships due to a lack of support from their children. In a country where the educated class is expected to set examples of moral and ethical conduct, it is disheartening to witness the growing number of cases where parents are left to fend for themselves. One of the main reasons for such estrangement and abandoning the old parents by Indian youths is money or finances. A study conducted in June 2020, by the NGO Agewell Foundation, 71 per cent of India’s elderly reported an increase in maltreatment during the first Covid-19 induced lockdown. As a result, now the concept of old-age home is mushrooming in Indian society where the neglected parents are being sheltered which is too piteous. According to the Report of the Technical Group on Population Projections for India and States 2011-2036, there are nearly 138 million elderly persons in India in 2021 and it is further expected to increase by around 56 million elderly persons in 2031. There are 18 million homeless elderly persons in India based on the Longitudinal Ageing Survey of India 2020. Currently, there are 728 old age homes, both private and public in India providing different geriatric services. The Government must take cognizance of this distressing trend and ensure that elderly parents are financially secure by mandating their inclusion in wage determination. Various international labour standards, including those set by the International Labour Organization (ILO), emphasize the necessity of fair wages that take into account all essential living expenses, including the care of elderly dependents. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights also emphasizes the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care. 

The Staff Side has also emphasized the necessity of redefining the components considered while determining minimum wages. The Dr. Aykrod Formula primarily accounts for food items, but it neglects essential ingredients such as salt and spices, which are indispensable for meal preparation. Additionally, beverages like tea and coffee, which have become fundamental to daily life, are currently excluded. With changing dietary habits, items such as packaged food, fortified grains, and ready-to-eat meals are becoming increasingly necessary, especially for working professionals who may not have the time for traditional cooking methods. Moreover, nutritional supplements, baby food, and protein-rich diets are vital for health and must be factored into the revised wage determination. 

Beyond food, the formula fails to accommodate several non-food essentials. Presently, it only considers clothing and stitching expenses but ignores critical items such as bed sheets, pillow covers, socks, sweaters, toothpaste, shaving cream, utensils, and stoves etc. In today’s digital age, electronic devices such as mobile phones, computers laptops and internet services have become necessities for education, communication, and employment, yet they remain unaccounted for in the minimum wage calculation. Other daily necessities, including cleaning supplies like detergent, soaps, dishwashing liquid, feminine hygiene products and such other basic home maintenance items also need to be factored into the revised wage determination process. The need for reliable public or private transport expenses should also be taken into account, as daily commuting is an unavoidable expense for most employees. 

Prior to the implementation of the 7th CPC, the Staff Side had demanded a minimum wage of Rs.26,000, which was ultimately curtailed to Rs.18,000. This figure remains insufficient given the ever-rising cost of living, inflation, and increased financial responsibilities of an average Indian worker. The proposed modification of the Dr. Aykrod Formula to five CUs and the inclusion of essential commodities and technological necessities would pave the way for a dignified living wage, not just a subsistence wage. The rising cost of education, including tuition fees, books, and online learning resources, further highlights the need for a comprehensive wage revision. With evolving lifestyle requirements, an updated formula must account for childcare expenses, elderly care, and the overall well-being of the family.  

The Government must recognize the necessity of modifying the Dr. Aykrod Formula and direct the 8th CPC to not only determine a minimum wage but a decent living wage that accurately reflects modern economic and social realities. The inclusion of dependent parents as part of the Consumption Units and the revision of essential commodities considered for wage determination is critical for ensuring financial security and a dignified standard of living for millions of Indian families. Ensuring that the formula reflects the costs of a modern household, including elderly support and digital accessibility, is crucial in this era of rapid technological and social transformation. Without such reforms, millions of wage earners will continue to struggle to meet their family’s basic needs, leading to economic distress and social instability.

The time for reform is now. The Government, policymakers, and labour representatives must work together to implement these much-needed modifications to safeguard the well-being of employees and their families. Only by ensuring a fair and adequate wage structure can we truly uphold the principles of social justice and economic equity in India. Addressing the financial needs of the entire family, including elderly parents, and ensuring that wages are reflective of contemporary living conditions, will create a more stable and prosperous society for all.

(The author is a Service Union Representative and a Columnist. Mobile: 9437022669, eMail: samalbruhaspati@gmail.com)

*****

Friday, February 14, 2025

ପେନସନ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ରହିବ ତ

ପେନସନ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ରହିବ ତ 

(ମୂଳ‌ଲେଖା)

ବୃହସ୍ପତି ସାମଲ 

ସାଧାରଣ ସମ୍ପାଦକ 

କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ଓ ଶ୍ରମିକ ପରିସଂଘ 

ଓଡ଼ିଶା ରାଜ୍ୟ ସମନ୍ୱୟ ସମିତି, ଭୁବନେଶ୍ୱର 

      ସାରା ଦେଶର କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କ ପକ୍ଷରୁ ୨୦୦୪ରୁ ପ୍ରଚଳିତ ନୂତନ ପେନସନ ଯୋଜନା (ଏନପିଏସ)ର ସମ୍ପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ଉଚ୍ଛେଦ ସହ ପୁରାତନ ପେନସନ ଯୋଜନା (ଓପିଏସ୍)ର ପୁନଃ ‌ପ୍ରଚଳନ ପାଇଁ ଦୀର୍ଘ  ୨୦ ବର୍ଷ ଧରି ଯେଉଁ ନିରବଚ୍ଛିନ୍ନ ସଂଗ୍ରାମ ଚାଲିଥିଲା ତାହାର ପରିଣତି ସ୍ବରୂପ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର ୨୪ ଅଗଷ୍ଟ ୨୦୨୪ରେ ଏକ ପ୍ରେସ୍ ଇସ୍ତାହାର ଜରିଆରେ ଏକୀକୃତ ପେନସନ ଯୋଜନା (ୟୁନିଫାଏଡ୍ ପେନସନ ସ୍କିମ୍ ବା ୟୁପିଏସ୍) ନାମରେ ଏକ ନୂଆ ପେନସନ ଯୋଜନା ଘୋଷଣା କରି ୨୫ ଜାନୁଆରୀ ୨୦୨୫ରେ ରାଜପତ୍ର ବିଜ୍ଞପ୍ତି ଜାରି କରିଛନ୍ତି। କିଛି ନେତୃମଣ୍ଡଳୀ ଓ ସଂଗଠନ ଏହାକୁ ସ୍ବାଗତ କରିଥିଲାବେଳେ, ଓପିଏସ୍ ବଦଳରେ କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କୁ ହିତକୁ ଦୃଷ୍ଟିରେ ରଖି କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର ଏନପିଏସରେ ଯଥେଷ୍ଟ  ଉନ୍ନତି ଆଣିବାକୁ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ପକ୍ଷକୁ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ବାରମ୍ବାର ପ୍ରତିଶ୍ରୁତି, ଉପରୋକ୍ତ ପ୍ରେସ ଇସ୍ତାହାର ଏବଂ ରାଜପତ୍ର ବିଜ୍ଞପ୍ତି ଭିତରେ ତାଳମେଳ ରହୁନଥିବାରୁ ବହୁ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ଓ ଶ୍ରମିକ ସଂଗଠନ ନିଜ ନିଜର ଅସନ୍ତୋଷ ଜାହିର କରିବା ସହ ଓପିଏସର ନିସର୍ତ୍ତ ପୁନଃ ପ୍ରଚଳନ ଦାବିକୁ ଦୋହୋରାଉଛନ୍ତି ମଧ୍ୟ। ଇତିମଧ୍ୟରେ, ପେନସନ ନିଧି ନିୟାମକ ଓ‌ ବିକାଶ ପ୍ରାଧିକରଣ (ପିଏଫଆରଡିଏ) ୟୁପିଏସର ଚିଠା ନିୟମାବଳୀ ପ୍ରସ୍ତୁତି ପାଇଁ ସର୍ବସାଧାରଣଙ୍କ ଠାରୁ ଫେବୃଆରୀ ୧୭ ସୁଦ୍ଧା ମତାମତ ଲୋଡିଥିବା ବେଳେ ଉପରୋକ୍ତ ରାଜପତ୍ର ବିଜ୍ଞପ୍ତିର ଅନେକ ଧାରା ଓ ଶଦ୍ଦାବଳି କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କ  ମନରେ ସନ୍ଦେହ ଓ ଦ୍ୱନ୍ଦ ସୃଷ୍ଟି କରି ବହୁ ପରିମାଣରେ ହତୋତ୍ସାହିତ କରିଛି। ସମସ୍ତଙ୍କ ମନରେ ମାତ୍ର ଗୋଟିଏ ପ୍ରଶ୍ନ, “ଆଗକୁ  ପେନସନ୍ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ରହିବ ତ?”


    ପ୍ରଥମତଃ, ୟୁପିଏସକୁ ଏକ ପେନସନ ଯୋଜନା ଭାବେ ୨୪ ଅଗଷ୍ଟ ୨୦୨୪ରେ ଯେଉଁ କ୍ୟାବିନେଟ ମଞ୍ଜୁରୀ ମିଳିଥିଲା, ୨୫ ଜାନୁଆରୀ ୨୦୨୫ର ରାଜପତ୍ର ବିଜ୍ଞପ୍ତି ତାହା ଏକ ନୂତନ ପେନସନ୍ ଯୋଜନା‌ ନୁହେଁ, ବରଂ ଏନପିଏସ୍ ଅନ୍ତର୍ଗତ ଏକ ଇଛାଧିନ ବ୍ୟାପାର ବୋଲି ସ୍ପଷ୍ଟ କଲା। ଜଣେ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ଚାହିଁଲେ ଇଛା ପ୍ରକଟ କରି ୟୁପିଏସକୁ ଆପଣେଇ ପାରିବେ ନହେଲେ କୌଣସି ବାଧ୍ୟବାଧକତା ବିନା ଏନପିଏସରେ ପୂର୍ବଭଳି ରହିପାରିବେ। ମାତ୍ର ଥରେ ଇଚ୍ଛାକରି ଆପଣେଇ ନେଲେ, ପୁନର୍ବାର ଏନପିଏସକୁ ଫେରିବାର‌ ବାଟ‌ ବନ୍ଦ।


      ଦ୍ବିତୀୟତଃ, ପ୍ରେସ ଇସ୍ତାହାରରେ ଯେଉଁ ସବୁ ଅବସରକାଳୀନ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ  ସ୍ଥିରୀକୃତ ବୋଲି କୁହା‌ଯାଇଥିଲା, ସେସବୁ ପ୍ରକୃତରେ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ଓ ନିଯୁକ୍ତିଦାତାଙ୍କ ଦ୍ୱାରା ନିୟମିତ ବିନିଯୋଗ (ଉଭୟଙ୍କ ତରଫରୁ ମୂଳ ଦରମାର ଓ ମହଙ୍ଗା ଭତ୍ତାର ୧୦% ଲେଖାଏଁ)ରୁ  ସୃଷ୍ଟି ଇଣ୍ଡିଭିଜୁଆଲ କର୍ପସ ବା ଆଇସି ଓ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ତରଫରୁ ମହଙ୍ଗା ଭତ୍ତା ସହ ମୂଳ ଦରମାର ଅତିରିକ୍ତ ୮.୫%ର‌ ବିନିଯୋଗରେ ସୃଷ୍ଟି ପୁଲ୍ କର୍ପସ ବା ପିସି ଉପରେ ସମ୍ପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ନିର୍ଭରଶୀଳ। ତେଣୁ ୟୁପିଏସ ଏକ ପାଣ୍ଠି ଭିତ୍ତିକ ଯୋଜନା। ଏହି ଯୋଜନାରୁ ସମ୍ପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ସୁବିଧା ପାଇବା ପାଇଁ ଜଣେ କର୍ମଚାରୀକୁ ଆଇସିର ସମସ୍ତ ଜମାରାଶି ପିସିକୁ ହସ୍ତାନ୍ତର କରିବାକୁହେବ। ଚାକିରୀକାଳ ଭିତରେ ଯଦି ଆଂଶିକ ଉଠାଣ ହୋଇଥାଏ, ଏହି ଯୋଜନାରୁ ପୁରା ଲାଭ ଉଠେଇବାକୁ ତାକୁ ଭରଣା କରିବାକୁ ହେବ। ଆଂଶିକ ଉଠାଣ କିମ୍ବା ନିୟମିତ ଦେୟରେ ଖିଲାପ ହୋଇଥିଲେ ପିଏଫଆରଡିଏ ଏକ ବେଞ୍ଚମାର୍କ କର୍ପସ (ବିସି) ନିର୍ଦ୍ଧାରଣ କରିବେ। ଆଇସି ଯଦି ନିର୍ଦ୍ଧାରିତ ପରିମାଣରୁ ଅଧିକ ହୋଇଥାଏ, ତେବେ ବଳକା ପରିମାଣ କର୍ମଚାରୀକୁ ଫେରେଇ ଦିଆଯିବ। କିନ୍ତୁ ଯଦି କମ୍ ଥାଏ, ନିର୍ଦ୍ଧାରିତ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ ସମାନୁପାତିକ ହାରରେ କମିଯିବ। ଅଧିକନ୍ତୁ, ପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ (ଅବସର ପୂର୍ବ ୧୨ ମାସର ହାରାହାରି  ମୂଳ ଦରମାର ୫୦%) ପାଇଁ ସର୍ବନିମ୍ନ ୨୫ ବର୍ଷର ନିୟମିତ ଚାକିରୀ ଆବଶ୍ୟକ ଥିବାବେଳେ, ୨୫ ବର୍ଷରୁ କମ୍  ସମୟ‌ ପାଇଁ ମଧ୍ୟ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ  ସମାନୁପାତିକ ହେବ। ସର୍ବନିମ୍ନ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ ୧୦୦୦୦ ଟଙ୍କା ପାଇଁ ଅତି କମରେ ୧୦ ବର୍ଷର ନିୟମିତ ଚାକିରୀ କାଳ ଆବଶ୍ୟକ। କିନ୍ତୁ ତାହା ଥାଇ ମଧ୍ୟ ଯଦି ଆଇସି, ବିସିଠାରୁ କମ୍ ହୋଇଯାଏ, ତେବେ ବି ସର୍ବନିମ୍ନ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ ଆନୁପାତିକ ଭାବେ ପ୍ରଦାନ କରାଯିବ। ଏହି ସବୁ ଜଟିଳ ସର୍ତ୍ତାବଳୀରୁ ସ୍ପଷ୍ଟ ଅନୁମେୟ ଯେ ୟୁପିଏସରେ କର୍ମଚାରୀକୁ ସ୍ଥିରୀକୃତ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ ମିଳିବାର ସମ୍ଭାବନା ଅତି କ୍ଷୀଣ।


     ତୃତୀୟତଃ, ଏନପିଏସରେ କର୍ମଚାରୀର‌ ଦେୟ ମୂଳ ଦରମା ଓ ମହଙ୍ଗା ଭତ୍ତାର ୧୦% ଥିବା ବେଳେ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ଦାତାଙ୍କର ୧୪% ରହିଛି। ରାଜପତ୍ର ବିଜ୍ଞପ୍ତି ଅନୁଯାୟୀ ସରକାର ତାଙ୍କର ଦେୟ ପରିମାଣକୁ ୧୪%ରୁ ୧୮.୫%କୁ ବୃଦ୍ଧି କରିବେ। ଅର୍ଥାତ ମୋଟ୍ ୨୮.୫%ରୁ ୨୦%କୁ ନେଇ ଆଇସି ଓ ୮.୫%ରେ ପିସିର ସୃଷ୍ଟି ହେବ ଏବଂ ଯୋଜନାଟି ଏପ୍ରିଲ ୨୦୨୫ରୁ ଲାଗୁ ହେବ। କିନ୍ତୁ ଦୁଃଖର ବିଷୟ ଯେ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ଏଇ ଦେୟ ବୃଦ୍ଧି ବାବଦକୁ ଫେବୃଆରୀ ୧, ୨୦୨୫ରେ ଆଗତ କେନ୍ଦ୍ରୀୟ ବଜେଟରେ କୌଣସି ପ୍ରାବଧାନ ନାହିଁ।  ତେଣୁ ୟୁପିଏସର ଫଳପ୍ରଦ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟକାରିତାକୁ ନେଇ ସନ୍ଦେହ ଉପୁଜିବା ଅତି ସ୍ୱାଭାବିକ।


      ଏତଦବ୍ୟତୀତ, ସ୍ଥିରୀକୃତ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ ପ୍ରଦାନ‌ ପାଇଁ ପ୍ରତିଶ୍ରୁତି ରଖୁଥିବା ୟୁପିଏସ୍ ଯୋଜନାରେ କମ୍ୟୁଟେସନ ତଥା ପରବର୍ତ୍ତୀ ସମୟରେ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ ବୃଦ୍ଧିର କିମ୍ବା ସଂଶୋଧନର ପ୍ରାବଧାନ ନାହିଁ। ସେହିଭଳି, ତଥାକଥିତ ସ୍ଥିରୀକୃତ ପାରିବାରିକ ପ୍ରାପ୍ୟ କେବଳ ମୃତ କର୍ମଚାରୀର ସ୍ତ୍ରୀ ଅଥବା ସ୍ୱାମୀଙ୍କ ଭିତରେ ସୀମିତ ରହିଛି। କର୍ମଚାରୀ ହିତରେ ଏନପିଏସରେ ଉନ୍ନତି ଆଣିବାର ପ୍ରତିଶ୍ରୁତି ଦେଇ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର ଏପ୍ରିଲ ୨୦୨୩ରେ ପେନସନ କମିଟି ବସେଇ ଥିଲେ। ହେଲେ ୟୁପିଏସ ନାମରେ ଏକ ଇଛାଧିନ ପ୍ରସଙ୍ଗକୁ କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କ ପାଖରେ ଉପସ୍ଥାପିତ କରି ସରକାର ପେନସନ୍ ସମସ୍ୟାକୁ ଅଧିକ ଜଟିଳ ଓ ସନ୍ଦେହଜନକ ପରିସ୍ଥିତି ଭିତରକୁ ଠେଲି ଦେଇଛନ୍ତି।


  ଶେଷରେ ମୂଖ୍ୟ କଥାଟି ହେଲା, ୨୪ ଅଗଷ୍ଟ  ୨୦୨୪ର ପ୍ରେସ ଇସ୍ତାହାର ଅନୁଯାୟୀ ୟୁପିଏସ୍‌ରେ ସୁନିଶ୍ଚିତ ପେନ୍‌ସନ୍‌, ସୁନିଶ୍ଚିତ ପାରିବାରିକ ପେନ୍‌ସନ୍‌ ଓ ସୁନିଶ୍ଚିତ ସର୍ବନିମ୍ନ ପେନସନ୍‌ କଥା କୁହାଯାଇଥିବା ବେଳେ, ୨୫ ଜାନୁଆରୀ ୨୦୨୫ର ରାଜପତ୍ର ବିଜ୍ଞପ୍ତି ପେନସନ୍ ବଦଳରେ ପେଆଉଟ୍ ଶବ୍ଦ ବ୍ୟବହାର‌ ଏକ ଭିନ୍ନ ଦିଗକୁ ସୂଚିତ କରୁଛି। ଅର୍ଥାତ ୟୁପିଏସର ପ୍ରଚଳନ ଦ୍ଵାରା ପେନସନ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥା ଉଚ୍ଛେଦ ହୋଇ ପେଆଉଟ୍ ବ୍ୟବସ୍ଥାର ଅୟମାରମ୍ଭ ହେଲା ବୋଲି ବୁଝିବାକୁ ହେବ। ଏବେ ଆଉ ଅବସରପ୍ରାପ୍ତ ସରକାରୀ କର୍ମଚାରୀମାନେ ପେନସନଭୋଗୀ ନହୋଇ ଅନ୍ୟ କୌଣସି ନାମରେ ହୁଏତ ପରିଚିତ ହେବେ ଯାହାଦ୍ଵାରା ଭବିଷ୍ୟତରେ ଏକ ଭିନ୍ନ ସର୍ତ୍ତାବଳୀର ଅନ୍ତର୍ଭୁକ୍ତ ହୋଇ ସେମାନେ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ଠାରୁ ପେନସନ୍ ଓ ତତ୍ ସଂକ୍ରାନ୍ତୀୟ ଲାଭସମୂହ ପାଇବା ପାଇଁ ଦାବି କରିବାର କ୍ଷମତା ହରେଇ ବସିବେ।


    ଉପରୋକ୍ତ ସନ୍ଦେହକୁ ଦୃଢ଼ୀଭୂତ କରେ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର ନିକଟରେ ଗ୍ରହଣ କରିଥିବା ଆଉ ଏକ ପଦକ୍ଷେପ। କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରଙ୍କ ସାମାଜିକ ନ୍ୟାୟ ଓ ସଶକ୍ତିକରଣ ମନ୍ତ୍ରାଳୟ ଅଧିନସ୍ଥ ଜାତୀୟ ଅନୁଷ୍ଠାନମାନଙ୍କରେ ୧ ଜାନୁଆରୀ ୨୦୦୪ ପୂର୍ବରୁ ଚାକିରୀରେ ଯୋଗଦାନ କରିଥିବା ଯେଉଁ କର୍ମଚାରୀମାନେ ବର୍ତ୍ତମାନ ଅବସର ଗ୍ରହଣ ପରେ ପୁରୁଣା ପେନସନ ଯୋଜନାର ଲାଭ ଉଠାଉଛନ୍ତି, ସେମାନଙ୍କର ପେନସନ ଜାନୁଆରୀ ୨୦୨୫ରୁ ବନ୍ଦ କରିଦେବା ପାଇଁ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର ଏହି ସବୁ ଅନୁଷ୍ଠାନଗୁଡ଼ିକର ନିର୍ଦ୍ଦେଶକମାନଙ୍କୁ ଆଦେଶନାମା ଜାରି କରିଛନ୍ତି। ଏହି ଜାତୀୟ ଅନୁଷ୍ଠାନମାନଙ୍କରେ  ୧ ଜାନୁଆରୀ ୨୦୦୪ ପୂର୍ବରୁ ନିଯୁକ୍ତ ଥିବା କର୍ମଚାରୀମାନେ ଓପିଏସ୍ ପାଇଁ ହକଦାର ହେବେ କି ନାହିଁ ତାହା ବର୍ତ୍ତମାନ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟୟ ବିଭାଗର ବିଚାରାଧୀନ। ଯଦିଓ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ସଂଗଠନଗୁଡ଼ିକର ତୁରନ୍ତ ହସ୍ତକ୍ଷେପ ଫଳରେ ପେନସନ୍ ବନ୍ଦ୍  ପ୍ରକ୍ରିୟାକୁ ଆଗାମୀ ଛଅ ମାସ (ଜୁନ୍ ୨୦୨୫) ପର୍ଯ୍ୟନ୍ତ ଟାଳି ଦିଆଯାଇଛି, ଦୀର୍ଘ ଦୁଇ ଦଶନ୍ଧି ପରେ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ଏଭଳି ଆକସ୍ମିକ ପଦକ୍ଷେପ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ମହଲରେ ଏକ ଭୟର ବାତାବରଣ ସୃଷ୍ଟି କରିଛି। କାଲି ଆଉ କେଉଁ ଅନୁଷ୍ଠାନ ଯେ ବଳି ନପଡିବ ଏବଂ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର ପେନସନ୍ ପ୍ରତି ଯେ କଠୋର ଆଭିମୁଖ୍ୟ ଗ୍ରହଣ ନ କରିବେ, କିଏ କହିବ?


  ଏହି ପରିପ୍ରେକ୍ଷୀରେ ଭାରତୀୟ ଡାକ ବିଭାଗର ଏକ୍ସଟ୍ରା ଡିପାର୍ଟମେଣ୍ଟାଲ ଏଜେଣ୍ଟ (ଅତିରିକ୍ତ ବିଭାଗୀୟ କର୍ମଚାରୀ) ବା ଇଡିଏ (ଯେଉଁମାନେ ଏବେ ଗ୍ରାମୀଣ ଡାକ ସେବକ ଭାବେ‌ ପରିଚିତ)ଙ୍କ କଥା ଟିକେ ଆଲୋଚନା ‌କରିବା ଯୁକ୍ତିସଙ୍ଗତ ମନେହୁଏ। ପ୍ରଥମେ ଏମାନେ ନିର୍ଦ୍ଦିଷ୍ଟ ବୟସ ଓ ଶିକ୍ଷାଗତ ଯୋଗ୍ୟତାକୁ ନେଇ ଏକ୍ସଟ୍ରା ଡିପାର୍ଟମେଣ୍ଟାଲ ଏଜେଣ୍ଟସ (କଣ୍ଡକ୍ଟ ଆଣ୍ଡ ସର୍ଭିସ୍) ରୁଲ୍ସ ଅନୁଯାୟୀ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି (ଆପଏଣ୍ଟମେଣ୍ଟ) ପାଉଥିଲେ। ସମୟକ୍ରମେ ସେମାନେ ଗ୍ରାମୀଣ ଡାକ ସେବକ (ଜିଡିଏସ୍) ନାମରେ ପରିଗଣିତ ହେଲେ ଓ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ନିୟମ ବଦଳି ଯାଇ ଗ୍ରାମୀଣ ଡାକ ସେବକ (କଣ୍ଡକ୍ଟ ଆଣ୍ଡ ଏନଗେଜମେଣ୍ଟ) ରୁଲ୍ସ ହେଲା। ଫଳରେ ଜିଡିଏସମାନେ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି (ଆପଏଣ୍ଟମେଣ୍ଟ) ନପାଇ ନିୟୋଜିତ (ଏନଗେଜ୍) ହେଲେ। ଆପଏଣ୍ଟମେଣ୍ଟରୁ ଏନଗେଜମେଣ୍ଟର ଯାତ୍ରା ଭିତରେ ଏହି ବର୍ଗର କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କ ଭାଗ୍ୟ ପଥର ତଳେ ରହିଗଲା। କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରଙ୍କ ଅଧିନରେ ସିଧାସଳଖ କାମକରି ମଧ୍ୟ ଏମାନେ ନିୟମିତ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ କର୍ମଚାରୀର ମାନ୍ୟତା ପାଇଲେ ନାହିଁ କି ପେନସନ୍ ଭଳି ସୁବିଧା ସୁଯୋଗରୁ ବଞ୍ଚିତ ହେଲେ ମଧ୍ୟ। ଏ ବାବଦରେ ଦଶନ୍ଧି ଦଶନ୍ଧି ଧରି ସଂଗ୍ରାମ କେବଳ‌ ବିଫଳତାର‌ ସ୍ୱାଦ ହିଁ ଚାଖୁଛି। କିନ୍ତୁ ଅପରପକ୍ଷେ, ଏମାନଙ୍କୁ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ଭାବେ ବିଚାର‌ କରି ରାଜ୍ୟ ସରକାର ରାସନ୍ କାର୍ଡ, ସ୍ୱାସ୍ଥ୍ୟ କଲ୍ୟାଣ କାର୍ଡ, ଆବାସ ଯୋଜନା ଭଳି ବିଭିନ୍ନ କଲ୍ୟାଣକାରୀ ଯୋଜନାରୁ ଦୁରେଇ ରଖୁଛନ୍ତି। ଶବ୍ଦଟିଏ ବଦଳିଲେ ଗୋଟେ‌ କର୍ମଚାରୀର ଭାଗ୍ୟ କେମିତି ବଦଳିଯାଏ, ଗ୍ରାମୀଣ ଡାକ ସେବକମାନେ ତା'ର ନିଛକ ଉଦାହରଣ। ତେଣୁ ପେନସନରୁ ପେଆଉଟର ଯାତ୍ରା ପ୍ରାରମ୍ଭିକ ପର୍ଯ୍ୟାୟରେ ସମସ୍ତ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ଓ ପରବର୍ତ୍ତୀ ସମୟରେ ରାଜ୍ୟ ସରକାରୀ କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କ  ପେନସନକୁ ଯେ ସମୂଳେ ବିନାଶ ନକରିବ, ଏକଥା କିଏ କହିବ। ସରକାରଙ୍କ ଏ ଶବ୍ଦର ଖେଳ କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କ ପାଇଁ କାଳ ନ ହେଉ।

******

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Withholding of DA/DR Arrears during COVID time unjustified


Withholding of DA/DR Arrears during COVID time unjustified

- Bruhaspati Samal – 

In response to Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 172 answered on 3rd February 2025, the government reiterated its decision to withhold the arrears of Dearness Allowance (DA) and Dearness Relief (DR) for Central Government employees and pensioners covering the 18-month period from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. The Minister of State for Finance, Shri Pankaj Chaudhary, justified this move by citing the adverse financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fiscal burden of welfare measures, which, according to the government, made the release of these arrears unfeasible. However, this decision has sparked widespread dissatisfaction among the affected employees and pensioners, particularly when examined alongside the government's extensive financial expenditures in other areas. A closer look at these expenditures reveals a glaring disparity that questions the justification for withholding DA/DR arrears.

One of the major welfare measures taken during the pandemic was the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY), launched in March 2020 to provide free food grains to approximately 80 crore people. While the scheme was undoubtedly necessary to mitigate economic hardship, its financial burden on the government was substantial. Initial reports from the Press Information Bureau indicated that the expenditure on the scheme amounted to nearly Rs.2.60 lakh crore, and by December 2022, the total spending had risen to Rs.3.43 lakh crore. The government’s commitment to ensuring food security for the vulnerable sections of society was commendable, but it also raises concerns about the selective approach in prioritizing fiscal allocations, particularly when the relatively modest DA/DR arrears are being denied to employees and pensioners.

Simultaneously, Indian banks have written off a staggering Rs.10.57 lakh crore in bad loans over the past five financial years. This includes write-offs of Rs.2.09 lakh crore in FY23, Rs.1.70 lakh crore in FY24, and Rs.2.34 lakh crore in FY20. The justification often provided for these massive write-offs is that they help clean up bank balance sheets, but in reality, they represent a significant loss of public funds. These write-offs often benefit corporate defaulters at the cost of the taxpayers, further highlighting the government’s misplaced fiscal priorities. 

Adding to this financial leniency towards corporate entities, in 2019, the government implemented a reduction in the corporate tax rate to 22% for domestic companies and 15% for new domestic manufacturing companies. This move, while aimed at boosting economic growth and attracting investment, resulted in an estimated revenue loss of Rs.1.45 lakh crore. Such tax concessions to corporate houses stand in stark contrast to the stringent measures imposed on government employees and pensioners, who have been denied their rightful arrears on the grounds of financial constraints. Furthermore, the Union Budget for 2025-26 introduced significant income tax cuts, raising the tax-free income threshold to Rs.12 lakh per annum. This move is expected to cost the government approximately Rs.1 trillion in revenue. While these tax reforms are designed to boost consumption and economic activity, they also reflect the government's capacity to forgo substantial revenue to achieve policy objectives.

The decision to freeze DA and DR for 18 months was projected to save the government approximately Rs.34,402.32 crore. This amount, when compared to the Rs.10.57 lakh crore in bad loans written off and the Rs.1.45 lakh crore foregone due to corporate tax cuts, appears relatively insignificant. This amount is approximately 1% of the Rs.3.43 lakh crore spent on PMGKAY, about 0.28% of the Rs.12.3 lakh crore in loan write-offs over the past decade, and roughly 2.37% of the Rs.1.45 lakh crore revenue foregone due to corporate tax cuts. This comparison raises questions about the government's fiscal priorities, particularly concerning its employees and pensioners. If the government could absorb these massive financial setbacks without adverse economic consequences, the claim that releasing DA/DR arrears would harm the nation's fiscal health seems unconvincing.  

The refusal to release these arrears is not just an economic issue but also a question of fairness. Central Government employees and pensioners served the nation through the pandemic, often working under challenging conditions. Releasing the DA/DR arrears would not only provide financial relief to them but also boost consumer spending, thereby stimulating economic activity. Denying them their rightful dues while allowing corporate tax cuts and loan write-offs creates a perception of fiscal discrimination. 

While maintaining fiscal discipline is crucial, it is equally important to ensure that government policies are just and equitable. The decision to withhold DA/DR arrears, despite the government’s willingness to incur significant financial losses elsewhere, disproportionately affects government employees and pensioners. Given the relatively minor fiscal impact of releasing the arrears in comparison to other financial commitments, the government should reconsider its stance. Doing so would not only reinforce trust among its employees but also contribute positively to the broader economy. 

(The author is a Service Union Representative and a Columnist. Mobile: 9437022669, eMail: samalbruhaspati@gmail.com)

*****

Monday, February 10, 2025

ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ମେଳାର ବାସ୍ତବତା

  


ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ମେଳାର ବାସ୍ତବତା 

ବୃହସ୍ପତି ସାମଲ

ସାଧାରଣ ସମ୍ପାଦକ 

କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ଓ ଶ୍ରମିକ ପରିସଂଘ

ଓଡ଼ିଶା ରାଜ୍ୟ ସମନ୍ୱୟ ସମିତି, ଭୁବନେଶ୍ଵର 

    ଏବେ ବର୍ଷର ବିଭିନ୍ନ ସମୟରେ ଉଭୟ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ଓ ରାଜ୍ୟ ସରକାରମାନଙ୍କ ଦ୍ୱାରା ବାରମ୍ବାର ଆୟୋଜିତ ରୋଜଗାର ମେଳା କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରଙ୍କ ଦ୍ୱାରା ପ୍ରଥମ ଥର‌ ପାଇଁ ୨୨ ଅକ୍ଟୋବର ୨୦୨୨ରେ ଆରମ୍ଭ ହୋଇଥଲା। ପ୍ରଧାନମନ୍ତ୍ରୀ ଏକ ଭିଡିଓ କନଫରେନ୍ସିଂ ମାଧ୍ୟମରେ ନୂତନ ଭାବେ ନିଯୁକ୍ତ ବ୍ୟକ୍ତିମାନଙ୍କୁ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ପ୍ରଦାନ କରି ଶୁଭେଚ୍ଛା ଓ ଶୁଭକାମନା ଜଣାଇ କହିଥିଲେ ଯେ, “ଆଜି ହେଉଛି ସେହି ଦିନ, ଯାହା ରୋଜଗାର ମେଳା ରୂପରେ ଗତ ୮ ବର୍ଷ ଧରି ଦେଶରେ ରୋଜଗାର ଏବଂ ଆତ୍ମନିର୍ଭର ଭାରତ ଅଭିଯାନ ପାଇଁ ଚାଲିଥିବା ଅଭିଯାନ ଗୁଡିକରେ ଏକ ନୂତନ ଅଧ୍ୟାୟ। ସ୍ୱାଧୀନତାର ୭୫ ବର୍ଷକୁ ଧ୍ୟାନରେ ରଖି କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର ଏହି କାର୍ଯ୍ୟକ୍ରମ ଅଧୀନରେ ୭୫,୦୦୦ ଯୁବକଯୁବତୀଙ୍କୁ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ପ୍ରଦାନ କରିଛନ୍ତି। ଆମେ ସ୍ଥିର କରିଲୁ ଯେ ଗୋଟିଏ ଥର ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ପ୍ରଦାନ କରିବାର ଏକ ପରମ୍ପରା ଆରମ୍ଭ ହେବା ଉଚିତ, ଯାହା ଦ୍ୱାରା ବିଭାଗ ଗୁଡିକରେ ଏକ ନିର୍ଦ୍ଧାରିତ ସମୟସୀମା ମଧ୍ୟରେ ପ୍ରକଳ୍ପ ସମାପ୍ତ କରିବାର ସାମୂହିକ ସ୍ୱଭାବ ବିକାଶିତ ହେବ।”

     ଏହି ପରିପ୍ରେକ୍ଷୀରେ, ଭାରତୀୟ ଡାକ ବିଭାଗର ଜଣେ ପ୍ରାକ୍ତନ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ଭାବେ ଲେଖକଙ୍କର ନିଜସ୍ଵ ଅଭିଜ୍ଞତା ହେଲା ବହୁ ପୂର୍ବରୁ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପାଇ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟରେ ଯୋଗଦାନ କରିସାରିଥିବା ଇନ୍ସପେକ୍ଟର, ଷ୍ଟେନୋଗ୍ରାଫର, ପୋଷ୍ଟାଲ ଆସିଷ୍ଟାଣ୍ଟ, ସର୍ଟିଂ ଆସିଷ୍ଟାଣ୍ଟ ଏବଂ ଗ୍ରାମୀଣ ଡାକସେବକମାନଙ୍କୁ ବ୍ୟକ୍ତିଗତ ଭାବରେ ଏହି ସ୍ୱତନ୍ତ୍ର ଉତ୍ସବକୁ ନିମନ୍ତ୍ରିତ କରି ମୂଖ୍ୟ ଅତିଥିଙ୍କ ଦ୍ୱାରା ସିଧାସଳଖ ନିଯୁକ୍ତିପତ୍ର ପ୍ରଦାନ ମଧ୍ୟ କରାଗଲା। ଅର୍ଥାତ, କୌଣସି ନୂତନ ଯୋଗ୍ୟ ପ୍ରାର୍ଥୀଙ୍କୁ ନୁହେଁ, ବରଂ କର୍ମଚାରୀମାନଙ୍କୁ ଏକ ବହୁ ଆଡମ୍ବର ପ୍ରକ୍ରିୟାରେ ଲକ୍ଷଲକ୍ଷ ଟଙ୍କା ଖର୍ଚ୍ଚ କରି ଫୁଲ ଓ ରଙ୍ଗୀନ ଆଲୋକମାଳାରେ ସୁସଜ୍ଜିତ ଏକ ସଭା ମଞ୍ଚରେ ରୋଜଗାର ମେଳା ନାଁରେ ଆଉଥରେ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ବଣ୍ଟନ କରି ଏଭଳି ପ୍ରଚାରପ୍ରସାର କରାଗଲା ଯେଭଳି ସରକାର ତାଙ୍କ ପୂର୍ବ ନିର୍ବାଚନ ପ୍ରତିଶ୍ରୁତି ରଖିବାକୁ ଶତଚେଷ୍ଟିତ। ଭାରତୀୟ ଡାକର ୧୬୮ ବର୍ଷର ଇତିହାସରେ ଏହା ସର୍ବପ୍ରଥମ ଘଟଣା ହେଉଥିବାରୁ ଏହାକୁ "ମିଶନ ରିକ୍ରୁଟମେଣ୍ଟ, ପ୍ରଥମ ଜାତୀୟ ଘଟଣା" ହିସାବରେ ମଧ୍ୟ ଅଭିହିତ କରାଗଲା। ଏହା ଭିତରେ ଦୁଇ ବର୍ଷରୁ ଅଧିକ ସମୟ ଅତିବାହିତ ହୋଇସାରିଲାଣି। ହେଲେ କୌଣସି ବିଭାଗରେ ନୂତନ‌ ପଦବୀ ସୃଷ୍ଟି ହେଉନାହିଁ କିମ୍ବା ଉଭୟ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ଓ ରାଜ୍ୟ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ଅଧିନରେ ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିବା ପଦବୀମାନ ପୂରଣ ହେଉନାହିଁ। ନିୟମିତ ପଦବୀ ଜାଗାରେ ସାମୟିକ ଓ ଚୁକ୍ତିଭିତ୍ତିକ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ନିର୍ଦ୍ଧାରିତ ବେତନ ଠାରୁ ସ୍ୱଳ୍ପ ମଜୁରୀରେ ଦିନରାତି ଖଟୁଛନ୍ତି ସିନା, ସେମାନଙ୍କୁ ନିୟମିତ କରି ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ବଣ୍ଟନ କରିବାର ଆନ୍ତରିକତା କୌଣସି ସରକାର ପାଖରେ ନାହିଁ। ବରଂ ନିଯୁକ୍ତିକୁ ସଂକୁଚିତ କରି ଅଧିକାଂଶ କାମକୁ ଆଉଟସୋର୍ସିଂ କରାଯାଉଛି। ସାରା ଦେଶରେ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟରତ ଅନ୍ୟୁନ ୨୫ଲକ୍ଷ ଅଙ୍ଗନବାଡ଼ି କର୍ମୀ ଓ ସହାୟିକା, ୧୦ ଲକ୍ଷ ଆଶା କର୍ମୀ, ୧୪ ଲକ୍ଷ ଆୟୁଷ ଡାକ୍ତର ତଥା ଲକ୍ଷ ଲକ୍ଷ ଭିନ୍ନ ଭିନ୍ନ ବର୍ଗର ଶିକ୍ଷକ ଓ ଅଧ୍ୟାପକ ଭଳି ବହୁ କ୍ୟାଡ଼ରର କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କ ଅବସ୍ଥା ଅତିବ ଶୋଚନୀୟ ଯାହାଙ୍କ ପାଇଁ ନିୟମିତ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ଅତି ଆବଶ୍ୟକ।  

   ସପ୍ତମ ବେତନ ଆୟୋଗ ୨୦୧୫ରେ ତାଙ୍କର ରିପୋର୍ଟ ପ୍ରଦାନ କଲାବେଳେ ସମସ୍ତ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ ଦପ୍ତରରେ ସାତ ଲକ୍ଷରୁ ଅଧିକ ନିୟମିତ ପଦବୀ ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିଲା ବୋଲି ଉଲ୍ଲେଖ କରିଥିଲେ, ଯାହା ଏବେ ବଢି ବଢି ଏଗାର ଲକ୍ଷ ଟପିଲାଣି। ସବୁଠାରୁ ଦୁର୍ଭାଗ୍ୟଜନକ କଥା ହେଉଛି ଲୋକସଭା ଅଣତାରକା ପ୍ରଶ୍ନ ସଂଖ୍ୟା ୧୫୬୯ ଜରିଆରେ ମାନ୍ୟବର ପ୍ରଧାନମନ୍ତ୍ରୀଙ୍କୁ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ ଦପ୍ତରରେ ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିବା ପଦବୀ ଉପରେ ନିର୍ଦ୍ଦିଷ୍ଟ ତଥ୍ୟ ଉପସ୍ଥାପନ ପାଇଁ ପଚରାଯାଇଥିବା ପ୍ରଶ୍ନକୁ ସହଜରେ ଏଡେଇ ଯାଇ କେବଳ ରୋଜଗାର ମେଳା ମାଧ୍ୟମରେ ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିବା ପଦବୀଗୁଡିକୁ ନିର୍ଦ୍ଧିଷ୍ଟ ସମୟସୀମା ଭିତରେ ପୁରଣ କରିବାକୁ ସମସ୍ତ ବିଭାଗକୁ ନିର୍ଦ୍ଦେଶନାମା ଜାରି କରାଯାଉଛି ବୋଲି ମାନ୍ୟବର କେନ୍ଦ୍ର କାର୍ମୀକ, ସାଧାରଣ ଅଭିଯୋଗ ଓ ପେନସନ୍ ରାଷ୍ଟ୍ର ମନ୍ତ୍ରୀ ଡଃ. ଜିତେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସିଂ ୩୧ ଜୁଲାଇ ୨୦୨୪ରେ ଉତ୍ତର ରଖିଥିଲେ। ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିବା ପଦବୀ ସଂଖ୍ୟା କିମ୍ବା ବିଗତ ଦଶନ୍ଧିରେ କେତେ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପାଇଛନ୍ତି ସେବାବଦରେ କୌଣସି ଉତ୍ତର ମିଳିଲା ନାହିଁ। 

    କାର୍ମୀକ ଓ ପ୍ରଶିକ୍ଷଣ ବିଭାଗର ତଥ୍ୟାନୁଯାୟୀ ୧ ମାର୍ଚ୍ଚ ୨୦୨୧ ସୁଦ୍ଧା କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରଙ୍କ ଅଧିନରେ ମଞ୍ଜୁରୀପ୍ରାପ୍ତ ମୋଟ ୪୦,୩୫,୨୦୩ ପଦବୀରୁ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟରତ କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କ ସଂଖ୍ୟା ଥିଲା ୩୦,୫୫,୮୭୩। ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିବା ପଦବୀଗୁଡ଼ିକ ମଧ୍ୟରେ ମୂଖ୍ୟତଃ ରେଳବାଇର କେବଳ ୨,୯୩,୯୪୩, ନିରାପତ୍ତା ବିଭାଗ (ବେସାମରିକ)ର ୨,୬୪,୭୦୭ ଏବଂ ଗୃହ ବିଭାଗର ୧,୪୩,୫୩୬। ମାର୍ଚ୍ଚ ୨୦୨୩ ସୁଦ୍ଧା ସମସ୍ତ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ ଦପ୍ତରରେ ୨୪% ବେସାମରିକ ପଦବୀ ଖାଲି ଥିଲା। ଏଥିମଧ୍ୟରୁ ତୃତୀୟ ଶ୍ରେଣୀ (ଅଣଗେଜେଟେଡ୍) ପଦବୀ ୩୩% ଏବଂ ଦ୍ୱିତୀୟ ଶ୍ରେଣୀ (ଗେଜେଟେଡ୍) ପଦବୀ ୧୬%। ତାବାଦ, ଲକ୍ଷ ଲକ୍ଷ ଚୁକ୍ତିଭିତ୍ତିକ ଓ ସାମୟିକ କର୍ମଚାରୀ ମଧ୍ୟ ଅଛନ୍ତି। ଅଧିକନ୍ତୁ, କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର ତାଙ୍କର ଘରୋଇକରଣ ଓ ଉଦ୍ୟୋଗୀକରଣ ନୀତିକୁ କ୍ଷୀପ୍ରତର କରିବା ପାଇଁ ଡାଉନସାଇଜିଂ ଓ ଆଉଟସୋର୍ସିଂ ନାଁ'ରେ ଦିନକୁ ଦିନ ପଦବୀ ସଂଖ୍ୟା ସଂକୁଚିତ କରିଚାଲିଛନ୍ତି। ସବୁଠାରୁ ଦୁଃଖର ବିଷୟ ହେଲା ପ୍ରଚୁର ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ସୁଯୋଗ ସୃଷ୍ଟି କରିବାକୁ କହୁଥିବା ସରକାର କେବଳ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାରୀ ଦପ୍ତରରେ ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିବା ୧୧ ଲକ୍ଷରୁ ଉର୍ଦ୍ଧ ପଦବୀକୁ ପୁରଣ କରିବାକୁ କେନ୍ଦ୍ରୀୟ ବଜେଟ ୨୦୨୫ରେ କୌଣସି ଠୋସ ପଦକ୍ଷେପ ନନେଇ କୋଟିକୋଟି ବେକାର ଯୁବକଯୁବତୀଙ୍କୁ ନିରାଶ କରିଛନ୍ତି। କ୍ରୟ ଶକ୍ତିର ଅଭାବ ସହ ଜନସଂଖ୍ୟାର ଏକ ବୃହତ ଅଂଶ ଆଜି ବ୍ୟାପକ ବେରୋଜଗାର‌ ଓ ମଜୁରୀ ହ୍ରାସ ଭଳି ସମସ୍ୟାରେ ଜର୍ଜରିତ ଥିବାବେଳେ ଚଳିତ ବଜେଟ ସେସବୁର ସମାଧାନ ପାଇଁ କୌଣସି ପଦକ୍ଷେପ ନନେବା ସରକାରଙ୍କ ତଥାକଥିତ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ମେଳା ଆୟୋଜନ ପ୍ରତି ଏକ କ୍ରୁର ଉପହାସ। ଅର୍ଥନୈତିକ ସର୍ବେକ୍ଷଣରୁ ଜଣାପଡିଛି ଯେ ଭାରତରେ ଶ୍ରମିକମାନଙ୍କୁ ମିଳୁଥିବା ମଜୁରୀର ସ୍ତର ମହାମାରୀ ପୂର୍ବର ସ୍ତର ଠାରୁ କମ୍ ରହିଛି ଏବଂ ଲୋକଙ୍କ କ୍ରୟ କ୍ଷମତା ହ୍ରାସ ଯୋଗୁଁ ଦେଶର ମୋଟ ଚାହିଦାରେ ସଂକୋଚନ ଘଟି ଅଭିବୃଦ୍ଧି ହାର ମଧ୍ୟ ‌ହ୍ରାସ ପାଇଛି। ତେଣୁ ସିଧାସଳଖ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପ୍ରକ୍ରିୟାକୁ ତ୍ୱରାନ୍ୱିତ କରି ଲୋକଙ୍କ କ୍ରୟ ଶକ୍ତି ବୃଦ୍ଧି ପାଇଁ ଚଳିତ ବଜେଟ ନୀରବ। ଅଧିକନ୍ତୁ ଜାତୀୟ ମନିଟାଇଜେସନ ପାଇପଲାଇନ ଜରିଆରେ ଅତ୍ୟନ୍ତ ଆକ୍ରମଣାତ୍ମକ ଭାବେ ଘରୋଇକରଣ ନୀତିକୁ ପ୍ରୋତ୍ସାହିତ କରାଯାଇଛି ଯାହା ନକାରାତ୍ମକ ଭାବେ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି କ୍ଷେତ୍ରକୁ ପ୍ରଭାବିତ କରିବ।

   ୨୦୧୪ରେ ଏନଡିଏ ସରକାର କ୍ଷମତାକୁ ଆସିବାବେଳେ ବର୍ଷକୁ ଦୁଇକୋଟି ଚାକିରୀର ପ୍ରତିଶ୍ରୁତି ଦେଇ କ୍ଷମତା ଦଖଲ କରିଥିଲେ। ଦୀର୍ଘ ଦଶ ବର୍ଷର ଶାସନକାଳରେ ବେକାରୀ ସମସ୍ୟାର ସମଧାନ ଦିଗରେ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ସରକାର କେତେଦୁର ସଫଳ ହେଇଛନ୍ତି, ତାହା ସର୍ବଜନ ବିଦିତ। ଗ୍ରାମାଞ୍ଚଳ ଓ ସହରାଞ୍ଚଳ ସହ ଭାରତର ହାରାହାରି ବେକାରୀ ହାର ୨୦୧୪ରେ ୫.୪୪%ରୁ ବଢିବଢି ୨୦୨୪ରେ (ସେପ୍ଟେମ୍ବର) ୭.୮% ରେ ପହଞ୍ଚିଛି। ଏହି ପରିପ୍ରେକ୍ଷୀରେ ଓଡିଶାର ଅବସ୍ଥା ମଧ୍ୟ ଅତିବ ଶୋଚନୀୟ। ତଥ୍ୟାନୁଯାୟୀ, ୨୦୦୪ରେ ତୃଣମୂଳ ସ୍ତରରୁ ୭୫% ପଦବୀ ଉଚ୍ଛେଦ ହେବା ପରେ ଓଡ଼ିଶା ସରକାରଙ୍କ ମୋଟ ୩,୯୯,୬୬୬ ମଞ୍ଜୁରୀ ପ୍ରାପ୍ତ ପଦବୀରୁ ୧,୩୨,୪୫୯ ପଦବୀ ଦୀର୍ଘ ଦିନ ଧରି ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିବା ସତ୍ତ୍ୱେ, ସେପ୍ଟେମ୍ବର ୨୦୨୪ରେ ମାତ୍ର ୨୨୦୦୦ ଓ ଡିସେମ୍ବର ୨୦୨୪ରେ ମାତ୍ର ୩୭୬ ଜଣଙ୍କୁ ରୋଜଗାର ମେଳା ଜରିଆରେ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ବାଣ୍ଟିବା ଅଗଣିତ ବେକାର ଯୁବକଯୁବତୀଙ୍କ ପ୍ରତି ଏକ କ୍ରୁର ଉପହାସ। 

      ପ୍ରଶ୍ନ ଉଠେ, ଯଦି ବେକାର ଯୁବକଯୁବତୀଙ୍କ ଥଇଥାନ ପାଇଁ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ବ୍ୟଗ୍ରତା ଓ ଆନ୍ତରିକତାରେ ରୋଜଗାର ମେଳାମାନ ବାରମ୍ବାର ଆୟୋଜିତ ହେଉଛି, ତେବେ ଏତେସଂଖ୍ୟକ କିଂକର୍ତ୍ତବ୍ୟବିମୁଢ ବେକାର ଯୁବକଯୁବତୀ ସରକାରୀ ଚାକିରୀ ପାଇବାର ପ୍ରତିଶ୍ରୁତିରେ ବିଭିନ୍ନ ଘରୋଇ ସଂସ୍ଥାମାନଙ୍କର ଦ୍ୱାରା କେମିତି ଓ କାହିଁକି ଠକେଇର ଶିକାର ହେଉଛନ୍ତି? ତଥ୍ୟାନୁଯାୟୀ ୨୦୨୦ରୁ ୨୦୨୩ ମଧ୍ୟରେ ହୋଇଥିବା ମୋଟ ସାଇବର ଅପରାଧର ୧୫% ଠକେଇ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ସଂକ୍ରାନ୍ତୀୟ ଯାହାର ଶୀକାର ମୂଖ୍ୟତଃ ୨୧ରୁ ୩୦ ବର୍ଷର ପିଲାମାନେ ହୋଇଥାନ୍ତି ଏବଂ ଏଇ ଠକେଇର ପରିମାଣ ଦଶ ହଜାରରୁ ପଚାର ହଜାର ଟଙ୍କା ଏବଂ ସ୍ଥଳ ବିଶେଷରେ ଲକ୍ଷାଧିକ ମଧ୍ୟ ହୋଇଥାଏ। ଭାରତ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ପରିସଂଖ୍ୟାନ ମନ୍ତ୍ରାଳୟ ୨୦୨୩-୨୪ରେ ୧୫ରୁ ୨୯ ବର୍ଷର ଯୁବକଯୁବତୀଙ୍କ ମଧ୍ୟରେ ବେକାରୀ ହାର ୧୦.୨% ବୋଲି ଆକଳନ କରିଛି। 

       ମେଳା ଆୟୋଜନ ମାଧ୍ୟମରେ ଉଭୟ ରାଜ୍ୟ ଓ କେନ୍ଦ୍ରସରକାର ଯଦି ଲକ୍ଷ ଲକ୍ଷ ସାମୟିକ ଓ ଚୁକ୍ତିଭିତ୍ତିକ କର୍ମଚାରୀଙ୍କୁ ନିୟମିତ କରି ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ବାଣ୍ଟି ପାରନ୍ତେ ଏବଂ ନୂତନ ପଦବୀ ସୃଷ୍ଟି କରି ସିଧାସଳଖ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ଦେଇପାରନ୍ତେ ତେବେ ଯାଇ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ମେଳାର ପ୍ରକୃତ ଉଦ୍ଦେଶ୍ୟ ସାଧିତ ହେବା ସହ କୋଟିକୋଟି ବେକାର ଯୁବକଯୁବତୀ ଚାକିରୀ ପାଇଁ ଠକେଇର ଶିକାର ହେବାରୁ ରକ୍ଷା ପାଇଁ ପାରନ୍ତେ। ତେଣୁ ଉଭୟ କେନ୍ଦ୍ର ଓ ରାଜ୍ୟ ସରକାରମାନେ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ମେଳା ଆୟୋଜନ ନାଁରେ ସରକାରୀ ଅର୍ଥକୁ ଅଯଥାରେ ବରବାଦ ନକରି ଏଭଳି ପ୍ରହସନକୁ ତୁରନ୍ତ ବନ୍ଦ୍ କରିବା ଆବଶ୍ୟକ। ନୂତନ‌ ପଦବୀ ସୃଷ୍ଟି ସହ ଖାଲି ପଡିଥିବା ସମସ୍ତ ପଦବୀ ପୂରଣ ଦିଗରେ ତ୍ୱରିତ ପଦକ୍ଷେପ ନେଇ ନିଯୁକ୍ତି ପତ୍ର ସବୁ ଡାକ ଯୋଗେ ପ୍ରେରଣ କଲେ ରାଜକୋଷକୁ ଫାଇଦା ହେବା ସହ ସରକାରଙ୍କ ସୁନାମ ବଢିବା ସଙ୍ଗେସଙ୍ଗେ ତଥାକଥିତ ଆତ୍ମନିର୍ଭର ଭାରତର ପ୍ରଚାରପ୍ରସାର ଆପେଆପେ ହେବ।

*****

Terms of Reference of 8th CPC already submitted were briefed to the Secretary, DoPT in the Standing Committee meeting of NCJCM on 10.02.2025



Friday, February 7, 2025

Justification of Universal Pension

Justification of Universal Pension  

Bruhaspati Samal 

General Secretary 

Confederation of Central Govt Employees and Workers 

Odisha State CoC, Bhubaneswar 

India’s journey with pensions began during the British colonial era, primarily for civil servants. After independence, the government implemented the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) to ensure income security for retired employees. This scheme provided a guaranteed, inflation-linked pension, calculated as 50% of the last drawn salary. It was entirely funded by the government, with no contributions from employees. However, fiscal challenges in the early 2000s, driven by a growing pension liability, led to significant policy changes. The National Pension System (NPS) was introduced on January 1, 2004, marking a shift from the defined-benefit model of OPS to a defined-contribution model. Under NPS, employees contribute 10% of their basic salary, matched by an equal contribution (subsequently raised to 14%) from the government. The funds are invested in market-linked instruments, and the eventual pension depends on investment returns. While this approach reduced the government’s financial burden, it introduced uncertainties for employees, as pensions are now subject to market risks.

In response to persistent demands from employees for more secure retirement benefits with restoration of OPS for last two decades, the government recently announced the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) on 24th August, 2024 followed by the Notification dated 24th January 2025 issued by Ministry of Finance (Gazette Notification dated 25th January 2025) which has dissatisfied the employees and pensioners since the term ‘Pension’ (Assured Pension, Minimum Pension and Family Pension) will henceforth be known as ‘Payout’ (Assured Payout, Minimum Payout and Family Payout) which is in strict contradiction to the Press Release dated 24th August 2024 on UPS. The declaration of the Central Govt. promising to revolutionize the pension system by streamlining processes and ensuring equitable benefits through UPS is seen to be confusing, as if there would be no pension system in future. As apprehended, the term ‘Payout’ in substitution of ‘Pension’ is a strategy of the Central Govt. to abolish the pension system since the above Gazette Notification clarifies that UPS is not a pension scheme, but an option under NPS. The replacement of OPS with NPS / UPS reflects the impact of neo-liberal economic policies, prioritizing fiscal discipline over welfare. While NPS reduces the government’s financial liability, it shifts the burden to employees, exposing them to market volatility. Public sector employees under NPS often find themselves at a disadvantage compared to their OPS counterparts, who enjoy predictable, inflation-linked pensions. Furthermore, there are glaring contradictions in pension policies. Defense personnel benefit from “One Rank, One Pension,” ensuring parity in pensions for retirees of the same rank, irrespective of retirement date. However, Agniveers, recruited under the Agnipath scheme, are excluded from pension benefits. Similarly, elected representatives continue to enjoy OPS-like benefits, while government employees and others are denied the same. These disparities raise questions about equity and fairness and go against the spirit of the Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 

Simultaneously, while West Bengal and Tamil Nadu did not adopt the NPS for their employees and already under OPS, states like Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, and Punjab have reintroduced OPS for their employees complicating the pension landscape. Adding to these complexities are state-specific pension initiatives. For instance, Odisha’s Madhubabu Pension Yojana provides financial assistance to senior citizens, widows, and disabled individuals. Similarly, schemes like Uttar Pradesh’s Old Age Pension Scheme and Tamil Nadu’s Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme cater to vulnerable populations. While these programs offer some relief, they highlight the fragmented and uneven nature of India’s pension system.

India’s fragmented approach leaves a significant portion of its workforce—especially in the unorganized sector—without any retirement benefits. As per the Periodic Labour Force Survey 2022-23 released in June 2023, 57.3% of the labour forces in India are self employed who are bereft of any social security and pension, 20.9% are regular salaried workers and 28.1% are casual workers. Of the regular salaried workers, 53.9% have no social security benefits. The casual and contractual workers increasingly replacing the permanent workers are deprived of social security scheme including pension. Above all, 94% of the workforces are engaged in the organized sector where social security is either completely absent or extremely week. These disparities are particularly concerning given India’s demographic trends. The India Aging Report 2023 underscores the urgency of addressing pension coverage. In 2022, individuals aged 60 and above constituted 10.5% of the population, amounting to 14.9 crore people. By 2036, this figure is projected to rise to 15% (22.7 crore), and by 2050, to 20% (34.7 crore). The decline of joint family structures and the rise of nuclear households further exacerbate the vulnerability of the elderly, making robust social security systems imperative. Pension systems have long been a critical aspect of social security, ensuring economic stability and dignity for retirees. In India, where socio-economic disparities are significant, and the aging population is rapidly increasing, the debate around universal pension coverage is both urgent and complex.  

India’s constitutional provisions provide a strong foundation for advocating universal pension coverage. Article 41 of the Indian Constitution directs the state to make effective provisions for securing the right to work, education, and public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness, and disability. Additionally, entry 24 of the Concurrent List under Schedule VII emphasizes old age pensions. Judicial pronouncements have also reinforced this perspective. In the landmark D.S. Nakra v. Union of India case (1982), the Supreme Court held that pension is not a bounty but a right, recognizing it as a deferred payment for past services rendered. Thus, Pension is a constitutional right.

Today the elderly population who have contributed a lot during their working life have become extremely vulnerable due to absence of worthwhile social security network including pension. Nobody can ignore their active participation in nation building and increasing the GDP. The State therefore can’t deny its responsibility in providing them with social security at a time when they become incapable of earning their livelihood in the old age. However, meeting the financial burden of universal pension is undoubtedly a challenge, but it is not insurmountable. The Govt. which is capable of providing free ration to nearly 80 crore citizens, to write off bad loans of the corporate houses frequently, i.e. 14.56 lakh crors during last 10 years, funding for universal pension to all citizens may not be a problem at all. More importantly, many countries with far lesser resources than India like Namibia, Botswana, Mauritius, Kenya, South Africa, Nepal and Bagladesh have already implemented Universal pension schemes. Additionally, the government can explore avenues such as rationalizing tax exemptions, increasing contributions from high-income groups, and leveraging technology to reduce administrative costs. Only the priority of the Govt. and direction of its policies are required in letter and spirit.

In conclusion, the justification for universal pension coverage in India is both a constitutional mandate and a moral imperative. As the nation grapples with an aging population, rising inequalities and the challenges of economic liberalization, a "One Nation, One Pension" scheme offers a pathway to equity and social justice. Ensuring economic security for retirees is not just a question of policy but a commitment to the dignity and well-being of every citizen. Policymakers must prioritize this commitment, balancing fiscal responsibility with the need for comprehensive social security.

(The author is a Service Union Representative and a Columnist. Mobile: 9437022669, eMail: samalbruhaspati@gmail.com)

*****

Thursday, February 6, 2025

FOSTER GENERATIONAL EQUITY

 

FOSTER GENERATIONAL EQUITY

- Bruhaspati Samal -

General Secretary 

Confederation of Central Govt Employees and Workers 

Odisha State CoC, Bhubaneswar 

In the 46th Episode of KBC (Kaun Banega Crorepati) 16, the show’s host, Mr. Amitabh Bachchan became surprised to witness the decision of Dr. Neeraj Saxena, a contestant to voluntarily quit after winning Rs. 3,20,000/- which was a rare and commendable act of selflessness. He chose to step back, allowing younger contestants to take center stage, emphasizing that the amount he won was sufficient for him and that others deserved an opportunity to benefit. This noble gesture, as noted by the show’s host, Mr. Amitabh Bachchan, was almost unprecedented in the show’s history. It serves as a stark reminder of the need to prioritize the younger generation’s aspirations and opportunities, a principle that seems to be lacking in certain government policies. In sharp contrast to Dr. Saxena’s actions, the Indian government’s increasing practice of reengaging retired personnel in various public sector and administrative roles has drawn significant criticism. This practice undermines the prospects of the country’s youth, who already face a severe unemployment crisis. Instead of fostering generational equity, these policies exacerbate the challenges for young job seekers, leaving many disillusioned and sidelined.

India’s unemployment crisis has reached alarming proportions. According to the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), the unemployment rate as of December 2024 stands at 7.45%. Among the youth aged 15-29, the situation is even bleaker, with unemployment exceeding 28%. This staggering statistic highlights the systemic issues in providing gainful employment to the younger population. Coupled with this is the failure to meet the government’s 2014 electoral promise of creating 2 crore jobs annually. Such unfulfilled commitments have left millions grappling with uncertainty about their future. Adding to the crisis is the government’s widespread practice of reemploying retired personnel across multiple sectors. Reports suggest that over 50,000 retired employees have been rehired between 2020 and 2024 in central and state government departments. This trend is most pronounced in critical sectors such as defense, public administration, education, and public sector enterprises (PSEs). In the defense sector, for instance, retired officers are frequently reappointed to advisory and operational roles. Public administration sees retired IAS and IPS officers rehired for consultancy and other responsibilities. Similarly, educational institutions often bring back retired professors, while PSEs rely on former executives to fill senior management positions. 

While the government justifies these practices on grounds of retaining expertise and ensuring continuity, the broader socio-economic realities challenge this narrative. The claim of a skill gap, often cited to defend reemployment, appears tenuous when juxtaposed against the fact that India produces over 8 million graduates annually. Among these are a significant number of engineers, doctors, and management professionals who remain underutilized. The persistence of reengagement policies in such a context not only stifles innovation but also deprives the youth of opportunities to contribute their fresh perspectives to the workforce.

The constitutional provision mandating retirement at the age of 60 aims to ensure periodic rejuvenation of the workforce. Overriding this mandate undermines its intended purpose and perpetuates an inequitable system where younger aspirants are left to fend for themselves in an already competitive job market. Furthermore, reemployment often disregards the economic and emotional toll on the unemployed youth, many of whom are the primary breadwinners for their families. India’s labour force participation rate (LFPR) reflects a worrying trend. According to the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) 2023, the overall LFPR stands at just 39.5%, significantly lower than the global average. Among women, the participation rate is even more dismal at 24.6%, indicating a severe underutilization of the country’s potential workforce. The increasing reliance on retired personnel exacerbates these issues by further limiting the avenues available to the younger demographic.

Critics argue that the government’s approach to reemployment is driven more by convenience and cost-efficiency than genuine necessity. Contractual reengagements are often perceived as a less expensive alternative to recruiting new, permanent employees. However, this approach neglects the long-term socio-economic consequences of excluding younger individuals from the workforce. The lack of opportunities for the youth not only hampers their personal growth but also affects the nation’s overall economic productivity and innovation potential.

Collaborative efforts between the Govt., opposition political parties, intellectuals, and civil society can create a unified front to address these pressing issues. The government must adopt a multi-faceted strategy. Strict regulation of reemployment practices is essential. Reengagement of retired personnel should be limited to critical sectors where skill shortages are genuinely evident, and even then, it should be accompanied by a clear timeline for transitioning to younger replacements. Government departments and public sector enterprises must develop robust strategies to groom internal talent for higher roles through targeted training programs, mentorship initiatives, and opportunities for skill enhancement which would ensure that younger employees are adequately prepared to take on leadership responsibilities, reducing the reliance on retired professionals. Accelerating public sector recruitment drives, particularly in high-demand areas such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure development, can significantly alleviate unemployment pressures. Intellectuals and civil society have a crucial role to play in addressing these issues. By advocating for policy changes and raising public awareness about the adverse effects of reemployment practices, they can drive meaningful change. Academics and researchers can contribute by conducting studies on unemployment trends and providing data-driven insights to inform policy decisions. Opposition political parties must also step up to hold the government accountable for its employment policies. By demanding transparency and proposing viable alternatives during legislative debates and public campaigns, they can highlight the gaps in current practices and advocate for a fairer system. 

The youth, as the backbone of the nation, deserve nothing less than a system that values their potential and supports their aspirations. The practice of reengagement, while justifiable in specific cases, has become increasingly common, raising concerns about its impact on the country’s unemployed youth. By curbing the practice of reemployment and implementing inclusive policies, the government can not only address the current challenges but also lay the foundation for a more equitable and prosperous society.

(The writer is a Service Union Representative and a Columnist.)

*****

Saturday, February 1, 2025

Union Budget 2025: Except Tax Relief Major Concerns Remain Unaddressed for Employees

 


Union Budget 2025: Except Tax Relief Major Concerns Remain Unaddressed for Employees

Bruhaspati Samal

General Secretary

Confederation of Central Govt. Employees and Workers

Odisha State Coordination Committee, Bhubaneswar


The Union Budget 2025, presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on February 1, 2025, has introduced significant tax relief measures aimed at the salaried middle class. However, beyond these tax adjustments, the budget appears to have overlooked several critical areas concerning the welfare of employees and pensioners. While tax benefits provide some respite, various other pressing issues remain unresolved, raising concerns among government employees and retirees.

In an effort to increase disposable income and boost consumption, the government has revised the income tax slabs under the new tax regime. In the new tax regime, the revised tax rate structure will stand as follows:

As announced, no personal income tax is payable up to income of Rs 12 lakh (i.e. average income of Rs 1 lakh per month other than special rate income such as capital gains) under the new regime. This limit will be Rs 12.75 lakh for salaried tax payers, due to standard deduction of Rs 75,000. The new structure will substantially reduce the taxes of the middle class and leave more money in their hands, boosting household consumption, savings and investment. But the new Income-Tax Bill scheduled to be placed in the next week to be clear and direct in text so as to make it simple to understand for taxpayers and tax administration, leading to tax certainty and reduced litigation which has created suspicion in the minds of the employees. It is said that revenue of about Rs. 1 lakh crore in direct taxes will be forgone. Instead, it is a fact that nearly 1 crore new Taxpayers are likely to enrolled which may increase the flow of collection of IT and make good the said shortfall. For senior citizens, the tax deduction limit on interest income has been doubled, and the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) threshold on rental income has been raised, providing them with additional financial relief. While these changes will benefit many taxpayers, the budget has been criticized for failing to address other crucial concerns of employees and pensioners.

One of the major disappointments in the budget is the absence of any mention of the government’s declared intent to increase its contribution to the Unified Pension Scheme. As per the Gazette Notification dated January 25, 2025, the government had announced an increase in its contribution from 14% to 18.5%, to be implemented from May 1, 2025. However, this crucial measure was not reflected in the budget, leaving many pensioners in a state of uncertainty. The lack of financial allocation or even a mention in the budget raises questions about the government's commitment to the welfare of pensioners. Another significant omission in the budget is the non-mention of the 8th CPC. The government had previously indicated its intent to constitute the 8th CPC to revise pay scales and benefits for central government employees. However, the budget does not include any allocation or plan for its implementation, leading to speculation that the matter has been deferred indefinitely. Central government employees have been expecting a revision in their pay scales to keep up with the rising cost of living. The absence of any announcement regarding the CPC not only dampens their morale but also affects their financial stability, as salary hikes have remained stagnant for years.

Another major disappointment is the failure to address the pending Dearness Allowance (DA) arrears for the 18-month period from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Despite repeated demands from employees and pensioners, the government has not provided any assurance regarding the release of the withheld DA/DR payments. This prolonged delay has financially strained many government employees and pensioners, who were expecting a resolution in this year’s budget. The issue of vacant government positions is another pressing concern that remains unaddressed. As of January 2025, there are approximately 11 lakh vacant posts in various central government departments. Filling these positions would not only improve administrative efficiency but also provide much-needed employment opportunities, particularly at a time when India’s unemployment rate stood at 7.8% in December 2024, The lack of any concrete announcements regarding recruitment drives in the budget has left job seekers disappointed.

Healthcare and insurance are other key areas where the budget falls short in addressing employee welfare. While the government announced plans to establish Day Care Cancer Centres in district hospitals over the next three years, the budget did not provide a comprehensive strategy to enhance overall healthcare benefits for employees. Given that out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in India remains alarmingly high at 62.4% of total health expenses, the absence of enhanced medical support for employees and pensioners is a significant drawback. A more robust healthcare policy with improved insurance coverage could have alleviated the financial burden on the workforce.

The budget also introduced certain provisions for gig workers, proposing the issuance of identity cards and the registration of one crore gig workers on the e-Shram portal. This move aims to provide them with access to healthcare under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY). While this initiative is a step in the right direction, the absence of a comprehensive social security framework for gig workers leaves them vulnerable to financial instability.

 While the Union Budget 2025 offers notable tax relief to salaried employees and senior citizens, it has failed to address several crucial issues that directly impact government employees and pensioners. The lack of provisions for pension reforms, salary revisions, DA arrears, job creation, and healthcare improvements reflects a missed opportunity to enhance the welfare of the workforce. A more comprehensive and employee-centric approach in future budgets is essential to ensure holistic economic growth and social security for all stakeholders.

*****

HIGHLIGHTS OF UNION BUDGET 2025-26

 Ministry of Finance

azadi ka amrit mahotsav

HIGHLIGHTS OF UNION BUDGET 2025-26

Posted On: 01 FEB 2025 1:29PM by PIB Delhi

PART A

Union Minister for Finance and Corporate Affairs Smt Nirmala Sitharaman presented Union Budget 2025-26 in the Parliament today. The highlights of the budget are as follows:

Budget Estimates 2025-26

  • The total receipts other than borrowings and the total expenditure are estimated at ₹ 34.96 lakh crore and ₹ 50.65 lakh crore respectively.
  • The net tax receipts are estimated at ₹ 28.37 lakh crore.
  • The fiscal deficit is estimated to be 4.4 per cent of GDP.
  • The gross market borrowings are estimated at ₹ 14.82 lakh crore.
  • Capex Expenditure of ₹11.21 lakh crore (3.1% of GDP) earmarked in FY2025-26.

AGRICULTURE AS THE 1ST ENGINE OF DEVELOPMENT

Prime Minister Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana - Developing Agri Districts Programme

  • The programme to be launched in partnership with the states, covering 100 districts with low productivity, moderate crop intensity and below-average credit parameters, to benefit 1.7 crore farmers.

Building Rural Prosperity and Resilience

  • A comprehensive multi-sectoral programme to be launched in partnership with states to address under-employment in agriculture through skilling, investment, technology, and invigorating the rural economy.
  • Phase-1 to cover 100 developing agri-districts.

Aatmanirbharta in Pulses

  • Government to launch a 6-year “Mission for Aatmanirbharta in Pulses” with focus on Tur, Urad and Masoor.
  • NAFED and NCCF to procure these pulses from farmers during the next 4 years.

Comprehensive Programme for Vegetables & Fruits

  • A comprehensive programme to promote production, efficient supplies, processing, and remunerative prices for farmers to be launched in partnership with states.

Makhana Board in Bihar

  • A Makhana Board to be established to improve production, processing, value addition, and marketing of makhana.

 

National Mission on High Yielding Seeds

  • A National Mission on High Yielding Seeds to be launched aiming at strengthening the research ecosystem, targeted development and propagation of seeds with high yield, and commercial availability of more than 100 seed varieties.

Fisheries

  • Government to bring a framework for sustainable harnessing of fisheries from Indian Exclusive Economic Zone and High Seas, with a special focus on the Andaman & Nicobar and Lakshadweep Islands.

Mission for Cotton Productivity

  • A 5-year mission announced to facilitate significant improvements in productivity and sustainability of cotton farming, and promote extra-long staple cotton varieties.

Enhanced Credit through KCC

  • The loan limit under the Modified Interest Subvention Scheme to be enhanced from ₹ 3 lakh to ₹ 5 lakh for loans taken through the KCC.

Urea Plant in Assam

  • A plant with annual capacity of 12.7 lakh metric tons to be set up at Namrup, Assam.

MSMEs AS THE 2ND ENGINE OF DEVELOPMENT

Revision in classification criteria for MSMEs

  • The investment and turnover limits for classification of all MSMEs to be enhanced to 2.5 and 2 times respectively.

Credit Cards for Micro Enterprises

  • Customized Credit Cards with ₹ 5 lakh limit for micro enterprises registered on Udyam portal, 10 lakh cards to be issued in the first year.

Fund of Funds for Startups

  • A new Fund of Funds, with expanded scope and a fresh contribution of ₹ 10,000 crore to be set up.

Scheme for First-time Entrepreneurs

  • A new scheme for 5 lakh women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes first-time entrepreneurs to provide term-loans upto ₹ 2 crore in the next 5 years announced.

Focus Product Scheme for Footwear & Leather Sectors

  • To enhance the productivity, quality and competitiveness of India’s footwear and leather sector, a focus product scheme announced to facilitate employment for 22 lakh persons, generate turnover of ₹ 4 lakh crore and exports of over ₹ 1.1 lakh crore.

Measures for the Toy Sector

  • A scheme to create high-quality, unique, innovative, and sustainable toys, making India a global hub for toys announced.

Support for Food Processing

  • A National Institute of Food Technology, Entrepreneurship and Management to be set up in Bihar.

Manufacturing Mission - Furthering “Make in India”

  • A National Manufacturing Mission covering small, medium and large industries for furthering “Make in India” announced.

INVESTMENT AS THE 3RD ENGINE OF DEVELOPMENT

  1. Investing in People

Saksham Anganwadi and Poshan 2.0

  • The cost norms for the nutritional support to be enhanced appropriately.

Atal Tinkering Labs

  • 50,000 Atal Tinkering Labs to be set up in Government schools in next 5 years.

Broadband Connectivity to Government Secondary Schools and PHCs

  • Broadband connectivity to be provided to all Government secondary schools and primary health centres in rural areas under the Bharatnet project.

Bharatiya Bhasha Pustak Scheme

  • Bharatiya Bhasha Pustak Scheme announced to provide digital-form Indian language books for school and higher education.

National Centres of Excellence for Skilling

  • 5 National Centres of Excellence for skilling to be set up with global expertise and partnerships to equip our youth with the skills required for “Make for India, Make for the World” manufacturing.

Expansion of Capacity in IITs

  • Additional infrastructure to be created in the 5 IITs started after 2014 to facilitate education for 6,500 more students.

Centre of Excellence in AI for Education

  • A Centre of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence for education to be set up with a total outlay of ₹ 500 crore.

Expansion of medical education

  • 10,000 additional seats to be added in medical colleges and hospitals next year, adding to 75000 seats in the next 5 years.

Day Care Cancer Centres in all District Hospitals

  • Government to set up Day Care Cancer Centres in all district hospitals in the next 3 years, 200 Centres  in 2025-26.

Strengthening urban livelihoods

  • A scheme for socio-economic upliftment of urban workers to help them improve their incomes and have sustainable livelihoods announced.

PM SVANidhi

  • Scheme to be revamped with enhanced loans from banks, UPI linked credit cards with ₹ 30,000 limit, and capacity building support.

Social Security Scheme for Welfare of Online Platform Workers

  • Government to arrange for identity cards, registration on e-Shram portal and healthcare under PM Jan Arogya Yojna, for gig-workers.

 

  1. Investing in the Economy

Public Private Partnership in Infrastructure

  • Infrastructure-related ministries to come up with a 3-year pipeline of projects in PPP mode, States also encouraged.

Support to States for Infrastructure

  • An outlay of ₹1.5 lakh crore proposed for the 50-year interest free loans to states for capital expenditure and incentives for reforms.

Asset Monetization Plan 2025-30

  • Second Plan for 2025-30 to plough back capital of ₹ 10 lakh crore in new projects announced.

Jal Jeevan Mission

  • Mission to be extended until 2028 with an enhanced total outlay.

Urban Challenge Fund

  • An Urban Challenge Fund of ₹ 1 lakh crore announced to implement the proposals for ‘Cities as Growth Hubs’, ‘Creative Redevelopment of Cities’ and ‘Water and Sanitation’, allocation of ₹ 10,000 crore proposed for 2025-26.

Nuclear Energy Mission for Viksit Bharat

  • Amendments to the Atomic Energy Act and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act to be taken up.
  • Nuclear Energy Mission for research & development of Small Modular Reactors (SMR) with an outlay of ₹20,000 crore to be set up, 5 indigenously developed SMRs to be operational by 2033.

Shipbuilding

  • The Shipbuilding Financial Assistance Policy to be revamped.
  • Large ships above a specified size to be included in the infrastructure harmonized master list (HML).

Maritime Development Fund

  • A Maritime Development Fund with a corpus of ₹ 25,000 crore to be set up, with up to 49 per cent contribution by the Government, and the balance from ports and private sector.

UDAN - Regional Connectivity Scheme

  • A modified UDAN scheme announced to enhance regional connectivity to 120 new destinations and carry 4 crore passengers in the next 10 years.
  • Also to support helipads and smaller airports in hilly, aspirational, and North East region districts.

Greenfield Airport in Bihar

  • Greenfield airports announced in Bihar, in addition to the expansion of the capacity of Patna airport and a brownfield airport at Bihta.

Western Koshi Canal Project in Mithilanchal

  • Financial support for the Western Koshi Canal ERM Project in Bihar.

Mining Sector Reforms

  • A policy for recovery of critical minerals from tailings to be brought out.

SWAMIH Fund 2

  • A fund of ₹ 15,000 crore aimed at expeditious completion of another 1 lakh dwelling units, with contribution from the Government, banks and private investors announced.

Tourism for employment-led growth

  • Top 50 tourist destination sites in the country to be developed in partnership with states through a challenge mode.

 

  1. Investing in Innovation

Research, Development and Innovation

  • ₹20,000 crore to be allocated to implement private sector driven Research, Development and Innovation initiative announced in the July Budget.

Deep Tech Fund of Funds

  • Deep Tech Fund of Funds to be explored to catalyze the next generation startups.

PM Research Fellowship

  • 10,000 fellowships for technological research in IITs and IISc with enhanced financial support.

Gene Bank for Crops Germplasm

  • 2nd Gene Bank with 10 lakh germplasm lines to be set up for future food and nutritional security.

National Geospatial Mission

  • A National Geospatial Mission announced to develop foundational geospatial infrastructure and data.

Gyan Bharatam Mission

  • A Gyan Bharatam Mission for survey, documentation and conservation of our manuscript heritage with academic institutions, museums, libraries and private collectors to be undertaken to cover more than 1 crore manuscripts announced.

EXPORTS AS THE 4TH ENGINE OF DEVELOPMENT

Export Promotion Mission

  • An Export Promotion Mission, with sectoral and ministerial targets, driven jointly by the Ministries of Commerce, MSME, and Finance to be set up.

BharatTradeNet

  • ‘BharatTradeNet’ (BTN) for international trade to be set-up as a unified platform for trade documentation and financing solutions.

National Framework for GCC

  • A national framework to be formulated as guidance to states for promoting Global Capability Centres in emerging tier 2 cities.

REFORMS AS FUEL: FINANCIAL SECTOR REFORMS AND DEVELOPMENT

FDI in Insurance Sector

  • The FDI limit for the insurance sector to be raised from 74 to 100 per cent, for those companies which invest the entire premium in India.

Credit Enhancement Facility by NaBFID

  • NaBFID to set up a ‘Partial Credit Enhancement Facility’ for corporate bonds for infrastructure.

Grameen Credit Score

  • Public Sector Banks to develop ‘Grameen Credit Score’ framework to serve the credit needs of SHG members and people in rural areas.

Pension Sector

  • A forum for regulatory coordination and development of pension products to be set up.

High Level Committee for Regulatory Reforms

  • A High-Level Committee for Regulatory Reforms to be set up for a review of all non-financial sector regulations, certifications, licenses, and permissions.

Investment Friendliness Index of States

  • An Investment Friendliness Index of States to be launched in 2025 to further the spirit of competitive cooperative federalism anounced.

Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0

  • The Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0 to decriminalize more than 100 provisions in various laws.

 

PART B

 

DIRECT TAX

 

  • No personal income tax payable upto income of Rs 12 lakh (i.e. average income of Rs 1 lakh per month other than special rate income such as capital gains) under the new regime.
  • This limit will be Rs 12.75 lakh for salaried tax payers, due to standard deduction of Rs 75,000.
  • The new structure will substantially reduce the taxes of the middle class and leave more money in their hands, boosting household consumption, savings and investment.
  • The new Income-Tax Bill to be clear and direct in text so as to make it simple to understand for taxpayers and tax administration, leading to tax certainty and reduced litigation.
  • Revenue of about ₹ 1 lakh crore in direct taxes will be forgone.

 

  • Revised tax rate structure

 

  • In the new tax regime, the revised tax rate structure will stand as follows:

 

0-4 lakh rupees

Nil

4-8 lakh rupees

5 percent

8-12 lakh rupees

10 percent

12-16 lakh rupees

15 percent

16-20 lakh rupees

20 percent

20- 24 lakh rupees

25 percent

Above 24 lakh rupees

30 percent

 

 

  • TDS/TCS rationalization for easing difficulties

 

  • Rationalization of Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) by reducing number of rates and thresholds above which TDS is deducted.
  • The limit for tax deduction on interest for senior citizens doubled from the present Rs 50,000 to Rs 1 lakh.
  • The annual limit of Rs 2.40 lakh for TDS on rent increased to Rs 6 lakh.
  • The threshold to collect tax at source (TCS) on remittances under RBI’s Liberalized Remittance Scheme (LRS) increased from Rs 7 lakh to Rs 10 lakh.
  • The provisions of the higher TDS deduction will apply only in non-PAN cases.
  • Decriminalization for the cases of delay of payment of TCS up to the due date of filing statement.

 

 

  • Reducing Compliance Burden

 

  • Reduction of compliance burden for small charitable trusts/institutions by increasing their period of registration from 5 years to 10 years.

 

  • The benefit of claiming the annual value of self-occupied properties as nil will be extended for two such self-occupied properties without any condition.

 

  • Ease of Doing Business

 

  • Introduction of a scheme for determining arm's length price of international transaction for a block period of three years.
  • Expansion of the scope of safe harbour rules to reduce litigation and provide certainty in international taxation.
  • Exemption of withdrawals made from National Savings Scheme (NSS) by individuals on or after the 29th of August, 2024.
  • Similar treatment to NPS Vatsalya accounts as is available to normal NPS accounts, subject to overall limits.

 

  • Employment and Investment

 

Tax certainty for electronics manufacturing Schemes

 

  • Presumptive taxation regime for non-residents who provide services to a resident company that is establishing or operating an electronics manufacturing facility.
  • Introduction of a safe harbour for tax certainty for non-residents who store components for supply to specified electronics manufacturing units.

 

Tonnage Tax Scheme for Inland Vessels

 

The benefits of existing tonnage tax scheme to be extended to inland vessels registered  under the Indian Vessels Act, 2021 to promote inland water transport in the country.

 

 

  • Extension for incorporation of Start-Ups

Extension of the period of incorporation by 5 years to allow the benefit available to start-ups incorporated before 1.4.2030.

 

 

  • Alternate Investment Funds (AIFs)

 

Certainty of taxation on the gains from securities to Category I and Category II AIFs which are undertaking investments in infrastructure and other such sectors.

 

 

  • Extension of investment date for Sovereign and Pension Funds

 

Extension of the date of making investments in Sovereign Wealth Funds and Pension Funds by five more years, to 31st March, 2030, to promote funding from them to the infrastructure sector.

 

 

INDIRECT TAX

Rationalisation of Customs Tariff Structure for Industrial Goods

Union Budget 2025-26 proposes to:

  1. Remove seven tariff rates. This is over and above the seven tariff rates removed in 2023-24 budget. After this, there will be only eight remaining tariff rates including ‘zero’ rate.
  2. Apply appropriate cess to broadly maintain effective duty incidence except on a few items, where such incidence will reduce marginally.
  3. Levy not more than one cess or surcharge. Therefore Social Welfare Surcharge on 82 tariff lines that are subject to a cess, exempted.

Revenue of about ₹ 2600 crore in indirect taxes will be forgone.

Relief on import of Drugs/Medicines

  • 36 lifesaving drugs and medicines fully exempted from Basic Customs Duty (BCD).
  • 6 lifesaving medicines to attract concessional customs duty of 5%.
  • Specified drugs and medicines under Patient Assistance Programmes run by pharmaceutical companies fully exempted from BCD; 37 more medicines added along with 13 new patient assistance programmes.

Support to Domestic Manufacturing and Value addition

  • Critical Minerals :
    • Cobalt powder and waste, the scrap of lithium-ion battery, Lead, Zinc and 12 more critical minerals fully exempted from BCD.
  • Textiles:
    • Two more types of shuttle-less looms fully exempted textile machinery.
    • BCD rate on knitted fabrics revised from “10% or 20%” to “20% or ` 115 per kg, whichever is higher.
  • Electronic Goods:
    • BCD on Interactive Flat Panel Display (IFPD) increased from 10% to 20% .
    • BCD reduced to 5% on Open Cell and other components.
    • BCD on parts of Open Cells exempted.
  • Lithium Ion Battery:
    • 35 additional capital goods for EV battery manufacturing, and 28 additional capital goods for mobile phone battery manufacturing exempted.
  •  Shipping Sector
    • Exemption of BCD on raw materials, components, consumables or parts for the manufacture of ships extended for another ten years.
    • The same dispensation to continue for ship breaking.
  • Telecommunication
    • BCD reduced from 20% to 10% on Carrier Grade ethernet switches.

Export Promotion

  • Handicraft Goods:
    • Time period for export extended  from six months to one year, further extendable by another three months, if required.
    • Nine items added to list of duty-free inputs.
  • Leather sector:         
    • BCD on Wet Blue leather fully exempted.
    • Crust leather exempted from 20% export duty.
  • Marine products:
    • BCD reduced from 30% to 5% on Frozen Fish Paste (Surimi) for manufacture and export of its analogue products.
    • BCD reduced from 15% to 5% on fish hydrolysate for manufacture of fish and shrimp feeds.
  • Domestic MROs for Railway Goods
    • Railways MROs to benefit similar to the aircraft and ships MROs in terms of import of repair items.
    • Time limit extended for export of such items from 6 months to one year and made further extendable by one year.

Trade facilitation

  • Time limit for Provisional Assessment
    • For finalising the provisional assessment, time-limit of two years fixed, extendable by a year.
  • Voluntary Compliance:
    • A new provision introduced to enable importers or exporters, after clearance of goods, to voluntarily declare material facts and pay duty with interest but without penalty.
  • Extended Time for End Use:
    • Time limit for the end-use of imported inputs in the relevant rules extended from six months to one year.
    • Such importers to file only quarterly statements instead of a monthly statement.

*****

NB/RC/VV/KS/CNAN/GS/SC/AG/NJ