Tuesday, September 30, 2025

ଶାରଦୀୟ ଅଭିନନ୍ଦନ ଓ ଶୁଭେଚ୍ଛା - Warm Greetings on Happy Durga Puja


 🌸🇮🇳 Warm Greetings to all our beloved citizens of India on Happy Durga Puja 🇮🇳🌸

On this holy and joyous occasion of Durga Puja, I extend my heartfelt greetings and warm wishes to each and every citizen of our beloved India.

May Maa Durga, the embodiment of Shakti, bless our nation with strength, unity, and courage. Let her divine presence remove all darkness, injustice, and sorrow, and bring the light of peace, prosperity, and harmony to every home.

Durga Puja is not just a festival—it is a celebration of the eternal victory of good over evil, hope over despair, and truth over falsehood. Let us all come together, rising above differences, to honor our rich cultural heritage and walk hand in hand towards a brighter and stronger India.

🌺 May this Durga Puja fill our hearts with compassion, our minds with wisdom, and our lives with joy.

🌺 May the spirit of Maa Durga guide us to stand for justice, humanity, and brotherhood.

Wishing you and your family a very Happy and Blessed Durga Puja!

- B SAMAL -
General Secretary 

🌺🌺🙏🌺🌺🙏🌺🌺🙏🌺🌺🙏🌺🌺🙏🌺🌺

Saturday, September 27, 2025

Guidelines for allowing medical facilities under CGHS/CS(MA) Rules, 1944, to dependent transgender children/siblings irrespective of age — Reg

 ALLOWING MEDICAL FACILITIES UNDER CGHS/CS(MA) RULES, 1944, TO DEPENDENT TRANSGENDER CHILDREN/SIBLINGS IRRESPECTIVE OF AGE: MOH&FW O.M. DATED 16.09.2025

F. No. 2-1/2025-CGHS(HQ)/C&P/EHS(8328809)
Government of India
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
(EHS Section)

Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-11001 1
Dated: 16-09-2025

OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

Subject: Guidelines for allowing medical facilities under CGHS/CS(MA) Rules, 1944, to dependent transgender children/siblings irrespective of age — Reg.

In compliance with the provisions of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, it has been decided to allow medical facilities under CGHS/CS(MA) Rules, 1944, to dependent transgender children/siblings of Central Government employees (serving/pensioner) irrespective of age, subject to the following conditions:

 

  • Individual must be wholly dependent as per the financial limit specified in MoHFW OM No. per OM No. $.11012/2/2016-CGHS(P) dated 08.11.2016 (copy enclosed), on the central government employee.
  • Individual must have a certificate issued by District Magistrate, under the provisions of Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.

2.         This issues with the approval of competent authority.

Encl: As above

Digitally signed by
HEMLATA SINGH
Date: 16-09-2025
(Hemlata Singh)
Under Secretary to Government of India
Tele: 011-23061778

View/Download the PDF 

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Press Meet by FCPA, Odisha State Committee on 23.09.2025



The Forum of Civil Pensioners Association, Odisha State Committee, today (23.09.2025, Tuesday) held a Press Meet at Shramik Bhawan, Kharvel Nagar, Bhubaneswar under the presidentship of Com. Bruhaspati Samal, President of FCPA, Odisha. Both Com. Samal and Com. Rabindranath Dhal, Convenor, addressed the media and thundered their strong protest against the anti-pensioner and discriminatory provisions enacted through the Validation of Pension Rules, 2025 notified by the Central Government.

In this draconian amendment, the Government has deliberately created discrimination, division and class among the pensioners of the country—denying equal rights to pre and post Central Pay Commission pensioners. By deciding pension benefits on the basis of the date of retirement and reserving post-CPC benefits only to a section, the Government has struck at the very foundation of Article 14 of the Constitution which guarantees equality before law.

It was strongly reiterated that the historic D.S. Nakara Judgment of 17.12.1982 laid down the principle of uniform and equal treatment of pensioners. Any deviation from this principle is nothing short of betrayal to those who devoted 30–40 years of their life for nation building.

Further, the Central Government’s announcement that the recommendations of the 8th Central Pay Commission would not be implemented uniformly from the date of effect but only at its own “suitability and financial position” has invited deep resentment, anger, and outrage among crores of pensioners across the country. Pension is not a charity or ex-gratia but a deferred wage and a constitutional right, and any attempt to dilute it will not be tolerated.

The forum has once again demanded:

  • Immediate withdrawal of the Validation of Pension Rules, 2025.

  • Equal treatment for all pensioners without discrimination.

  • Constitution of the 8th CPC and implementation of its recommendations in full and with retrospective effect from 01.01.2026 without any further delay.

It was proudly recalled that the pensioners have already shown their collective power of struggle by organizing protest demonstration in the State Capitals and important cities on 03.04.2025. After that phase wise agitational programmes have been organized as follows.

- By forming a Human Chain on 25.07.2025 (Phase-I).

- By holding a State Level Convention on 24.08.2025 and submitting a Memorandum to the Hon’ble Governor of Odisha (Phase-II).

- By submitting a Memorandum to the Hon’ble MP, Cuttack on 10.09.2025 (Phase-III).

- And today, by bringing these burning issues before the press and media, with a call to echo the voice of pensioners to every corner of the country.(Phase-IV)

The battle is far from over. On 10.10.2025, pensioners from every corner of India will march to Jantar Mantar, New Delhi in the historic program of Parliament Gherao and will submit memoranda to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, the Hon’ble Prime Minister, and the Hon’ble President of India.

The Press Meet was attended by representatives from 8 Pensioners Associations of Odisha:

  • Sri H.K. Mohanty & Sri Lingaraj Sahoo (AIPRPA)

  • Shri Sankar Bose (Income Tax PA)

  • Shri Chittaranjan Beura (AIBDPA)

  • Shri Birendra Nag (AIRBSNLEWA)

  • Shri Sarada Prasad Samantaray (SNPWA)

  • Sri R.P. Ray Mohapatra (CWC PA)

  • Shri Purna Ch. Nayak (ICMR-RMRC PA)

  • Shri J.K. Mishra (Institute of Physics PA)

We express our heartfelt thanks to all participating comrades, associations, and the press/media personnel who stood with us today to amplify the united voice of pensioners.

Finally, in one voice, the FCPA Odisha sends a resolute message to the Central Government – Withdraw the discriminatory Pension Rules 2025, Constitute 8th CPC immediately  and implement its recommendations in full to uphold constitutional justice. The pensioners of this country are not weak or forgotten; united, we are a force, and we shall fight till justice is achieved.

- B. SAMAL -
President, FCPA Odisha
🙏🏻 In Solidarity & Struggle🙏🏻 









Thursday, September 18, 2025

The Unfinished Revolution of September 19, 1968


The Unfinished Revolution of September 19, 1968

 -Bruhaspati Samal - 

On 19th September 1968, India witnessed one of the most defining uprisings in the history of the working class. More than thirty lakh Central Government employees, cutting across railways, postal services, defence establishments, income tax offices, customs, accounts, and clerical departments, rose together in an unprecedented show of unity. They answered the clarion call of the Joint Council of Action (JCA), a coalition of the All India Railwaymen’s Federation (AIRF), All India Defence Employees Federation (AIDEF), and the Confederation of Central Government Employees and Workers.

This was not a sudden eruption of anger but a long-prepared response born from neglect and rising frustration. The employees had been fighting for a need-based minimum wage since the 15th Indian Labour Conference of 1957, which introduced the humane formula suggested by Dr. Wallace Akroyd, ensuring food, clothing, shelter, education, and healthcare for every worker’s family. Yet, the Second Central Pay Commission dismissed this principle, ignoring the very basis of dignified living. By the mid-1960s, inflation had swallowed employees’ modest earnings, reducing many families to debt, poverty, and silent suffering. When the demand for full neutralisation of price rise through Dearness Allowance was raised, the government refused, triggering deep resentment across the nation’s vast government workforce. 

The Joint Council of Action decided that the time for petitions was over. The time for collective defiance had come. On the morning of 19th September 1968, India awoke to an eerie silence in government offices. Railway platforms stood still, postal bags lay unsorted, and telegraph lines remained unmanned. For the first time since Independence, the machinery of governance stopped—not because of chaos, but because those who ran it chose to demand dignity over fear. 

The government, under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, responded with unprecedented repression. Just days before the strike, the draconian Essential Services Maintenance Ordinance (ESMO) was invoked, stripping employees of their democratic right to protest. On the ground, the state unleashed police and paramilitary forces to crush the uprising. Peaceful picketers were beaten, government leaders were arrested, and striking employees faced brutal retaliation. Across the country, over 12,000 workers were jailed, more than 64,000 were served termination notices, and 40,000 were suspended. Hundreds were dismissed outright, often without inquiry or recourse.

Amidst this climate of fear, a single act of defiance stood out. The Kerala government, led by Comrade E. M. S. Namboodiripad, openly refused to impose ESMA or deploy forces against its striking employees. Despite Delhi’s threats to dismiss his government, EMS held firm, declaring that governance without justice was tyranny. This rare moral courage became an enduring symbol of leadership in solidarity with the working class.  

The price of the rebellion was high. Across Pathankot, Bikaner, Guwahati, Delhi, and Upper Assam, seventeen striking employees laid down their lives. Some were killed in police firing, others were crushed by trains while picketing railway lines, and a few were beaten to death while defending their offices. Among the martyrs were Paresh Sanyal of Guwahati, Raman Achari, Kishan Gopal of Bikaner, Lakshman Singh, Raj Bahadur, Devi Raj, Gurdeep Singh, and Gama. These were ordinary workers who became extraordinary symbols of courage and sacrifice.

Even amidst the repression, the spirit of resistance refused to break. JCA leaders, many of whom were behind bars, called for renewed action. Hunger strikes began on 10th October 1968, and on 17th October, thousands gathered at the Prime Minister’s residence in a mass rally demanding justice. It was this relentless pressure that forced the government to yield on a crucial demand: when the Third Central Pay Commission was constituted in 1970, the formula for Dearness Allowance neutralisation based on the Consumer Price Index was explicitly included in its Terms of Reference. To this day, millions of government employees across India benefit from DA—a hard-won right secured through the sacrifices of 1968’s martyrs.  

But the greatest dream of the movement remains unfulfilled. The demand for need-based minimum wages, the very spark that ignited the strike, has remained elusive even after fifty-seven long years. Inflation continues to rise, social security has eroded, and precarious contracts have replaced secure employment. The very protections won in 1968 now stand under threat, silently slipping away as generations grow detached from the power of collective struggle. 

The significance of the 1968 strike was not lost in Parliament. In a Rajya Sabha debate on 14th May 1969, Vidya Charan Shukla, the then Minister of State for Home Affairs, disclosed that 512 employees discharged during the strike were reinstated, including 235 from Posts and Telegraphs, 187 from Railways, 61 from Defence, 16 from Rehabilitation, 10 from Audit, and 3 from Revenue and Insurance. But he also clarified that full amnesty was denied. Government press notes dated 18th October 1968 and 7th January 1969 laid out the partial relaxations, but many victimised employees never regained their posts or dignity. The state’s refusal to reconcile fully with its workforce remains a reminder of the power imbalance that persists even today.

This is not just history—it is heritage. The Dearness Allowance that cushions your paycheck, the leave you take without fear of penalty, the very concept of fair pay—these are not gifts from any government. They are scars carved into our system by those who refused to remain silent. To forget them is to dishonour them. To stay indifferent while rights are diluted today is to betray the seventeen who gave their lives in 1968. 

The strike of 19th September 1968 was not only a protest—it was a promise. A promise that the working class will never surrender its dignity. A promise that unity can bend power. A promise that justice must never be postponed. On this 57th anniversary, we must remember not only the martyrs but also the courage they inspire.

If the generation of 1968 could rise against repression with nothing but solidarity, why should today’s generation—better connected, better informed, and more empowered—choose silence? Long Live the Martyrs of September 19, 1968. Long Live the Spirit of Resistance.

(The writer is the General Secretary, Confederation of Central Govt. Employees and Workers, Odisha State Coordination Committee, President, Forum of Civil Pensioners Association, Odisha State Committee and a Columnist. eMail: samalbruhaspati@gmail.com)

******

 

Wednesday, September 3, 2025

The Stalled 8th CPC

Link: https://odishapostepaper.com/uploads/epaper/2025-09/68b89d5dc00ac.pdf 

                  The Stalled 8th CPC

Bruhaspati Samal 

General Secretary 

Confederation of Central Govt Employees and Workers 

Odisha State CoC, Bhubaneswar 

When millions of government employees and pensioners anxiously wait for justice in their pay and pension revision, the silence of the Government reverberates louder than any official statement. Inflation is burning through household savings, medical costs are skyrocketing, and living with dignity is becoming a daily struggle for pensioners. Yet, while the elected representatives of the people revise their own salaries and allowances without delay or hesitation, the workforce that keeps the administrative machinery of this nation alive is forced to wait indefinitely. The delay in the constitution of the Eighth Central Pay Commission (8th CPC) is not just bureaucratic lethargy—it is a betrayal of trust.

On 3rd December 2024, the Government had officially informed the Rajya Sabha that there was “no proposal” to constitute the 8th CPC. But within six weeks, in a press briefing after the Cabinet meeting held on 16th January 2025, it was proudly declared that the Hon’ble Prime Minister had approved its constitution. Letters were issued, suggestions were sought from the Staff Side of the National Council (JCM), and meetings were conducted in February 2025 to finalise the Terms of Reference. Yet, seven long months have passed since, and no tangible action has emerged. This deliberate inertia is spreading anguish and discontent among Central Government employees and pensioners, who together constitute crores of citizens across India.

The urgency of the matter cannot be overstated. The recommendations of the 8th CPC are due to take effect from 1st January 2026. But past experience is testimony that a Pay Commission takes nearly 18 to 24 months to complete its report. Illustratively, the 5th CPC, constituted in April 1994, submitted its report in January 1997, and the recommendations were implemented with effect from 1st January 1996 retrospectively. The 6th CPC, constituted in October 2006, submitted its report in March 2008, and the recommendations were implemented from 1st January 2006 retrospectively. The 7th CPC, constituted in February 2014, submitted its report in November 2015, and the recommendations were implemented from 1st January 2016. Each Commission required close to two years for its deliberations. Thereafter, the Government took further time to examine the recommendations, secure Cabinet approval, and notify their implementation. With barely four months left for the scheduled date of implementation, it borders on the impossible to expect that recommendations—when not even commissioned—can be implemented on time.

It is also important to note that the Finance Act 2025 has armed the Union Government with the authority to decide the date of implementation of Pay Commission recommendations. This means that even if the 8th CPC is eventually constituted and submits its report, the Government retains discretionary power to postpone the date of implementation. Such a move would be catastrophic for employees and pensioners already battling relentless inflation. One cannot ignore the possibility that the recommendations due from 1st January 2026 may be delayed under one pretext or another, pushing millions into further economic uncertainty.

Adding to the unease is the passage of the Validation of Central Civil Services Pension Rules as part of the Finance Act 2025. This legislation validates the Government’s authority to make distinctions among pensioners based on factors such as Pay Commission recommendations and date of retirement, with effect from as far back as 1st June 1972. Pensioners, who built the foundations of today’s India with decades of loyal service, now live under an air of suspicion and fear that the principle of equal treatment may be diluted. The Confederation of Central Government Employees and Workers has rightly taken exception to this divisive provision, affirming that there must be no differentiation among pensioners—past or present.

The larger picture reveals an unsettling pattern. The same Government that refuses to restore the Old Pension Scheme, that withheld Dearness Allowance and Dearness Relief for 18 months during the pandemic citing “financial constraints,” now delays the constitution of the 8th CPC despite knowing fully well the timeline required for its work. In sharp contrast, the salaries and perks of Members of Parliament and State Legislatures are revised at will, without any Commission, without any debate on affordability, and without any delay. Is the message not loud and clear—that justice is timely for lawmakers but expendable for those who serve the nation?

The Confederation has therefore issued a clarion call for agitation. It has urged organisations like CCGGOO, AIDEF, NCCPA, AISGEF, and Pensioners’ Associations to extend full support. This is not merely a bureaucratic demand—it is a call for dignity, for fairness, and for timely recognition of the contributions of employees and pensioners. The anguish is compounded when one compares the treatment meted out to employees with the preferential treatment granted to lawmakers. The People’s Representatives enjoy timely and generous revisions in salaries and allowances, often without even the fig leaf of a Commission or financial justification. Yet, those who toil in the field offices, departments, and public sector units—the backbone of governance—are compelled to live in uncertainty, anxiously waiting for a Commission that may or may not deliver on time.

The Government must realise that denial or delay of justice is the breeding ground of resentment. To keep crores of employees and pensioners in a state of prolonged suspense is neither statesmanship nor prudence; it is a recipe for alienation. A democratic Government cannot afford to alienate its own workforce, for governance itself depends upon their dedication and morale. It is time, therefore, for the Government to act with sincerity and urgency. The 8th CPC must be officially constituted without further delay, given adequate resources to complete its work, and directed to submit its recommendations within a time-bound framework. The Finance Act’s provision to arbitrarily defer the date of implementation must be reconsidered, for it erodes the credibility of the entire exercise. Above all, pensioners must be protected from any discriminatory treatment, for they have already given the best years of their lives to the service of the nation.

The message to the Government is unequivocal: crores of employees and pensioners are not expendable. They are the very hands and minds that keep India running. Delay in justice is not a technical matter—it is an assault on dignity. The Constitution of the 8th CPC is not a favour; it is a constitutional obligation, a moral necessity, and an economic imperative. Let not history record that in the age of rising prices and rising inequalities, the Government of the day chose silence over justice.

*****

Monday, September 1, 2025

Pros and cons of Factories Act Amendment in Odisha

Pros and cons of Factories Act Amendment in Odisha 

 Bruhaspati Samal

General Secretary 

Confederation of Central Govt Employees and Workers 

Odisha State CoC, Bhubaneswar 

In a move that has stirred both praise and apprehension, the Government of Odisha has amended the Factories Act through the Odisha Factories (Amendment) Rules, 2025, officially notified in the Extraordinary Gazette on 28 July 2025. This amendment permits registered factories in the state to employ women during night hours—between 7:00 PM and 6:00 AM—subject to a framework of mandatory safety measures and consent protocols. While the amendment aims to align with evolving labour practices and the progressive elements of the yet-to-be-notified central Labour Codes, it has also reignited a nationwide debate over the nature and direction of such reforms.

The amended rules provide that women can be engaged in night shifts only upon providing written consent. Employers must ensure secure transport, proper lighting in and around the workplace, the presence of female security personnel, and adherence to anti-sexual harassment (POSH) regulations. The entire process must be documented through a self-certification mechanism submitted online. These changes echo similar amendments already adopted by 32 other states and union territories, most of whom have tailored their respective laws to match the envisioned national labour reforms.

The government’s stated intent is to empower women by opening up more employment opportunities in the industrial and manufacturing sectors, particularly in roles that demand 24×7 operational capacity. Women working night shifts may benefit from increased earning potential, including overtime and shift allowances. The reform is also seen as a step toward equality, challenging traditional notions that restrict women’s physical and professional mobility. With increased access to supervisory and technical roles, especially in manufacturing hubs, the amendment could pave the way for greater gender parity in factory-based employment.

However, labour experts and trade unions remain skeptical of this apparent progress. Central Trade Unions such as CITU and AITUC have strongly opposed such state-level initiatives, branding them as precursors to the contentious Labour Codes that have been passed by Parliament but remain un-notified due to mass opposition across India. They argue that these changes are being pushed unilaterally by state governments under the influence of a larger ‘ease of doing business’ agenda that privileges employers at the cost of workers’ protections.

One of the central concerns is that the clause requiring a woman’s written consent to work night shifts may be exploited under conditions of economic desperation and poor job availability. In regions with high unemployment, workers may find themselves coerced into ‘volunteering’ for such shifts to retain their jobs. Critics also warn that enforcement of the prescribed safety norms remains weak. Odisha’s factory inspection regime is stretched thin, and in the absence of real-time monitoring and grievance redressal, the safeguards might remain confined to paperwork.

Medical and social researchers have also raised red flags. Numerous studies correlate night shift work with significant health risks for women, including disrupted circadian rhythms, sleep deprivation, increased cardiovascular strain, digestive disorders, and reproductive complications such as low birth weight or early delivery. Added to this are the often invisible burdens of domestic responsibility that Indian women continue to shoulder. For many, working through the night and managing a household by day creates a vicious cycle of exhaustion and emotional strain. This dual burden undercuts any notional financial gain from night work.

What further complicates the issue is the broader political and legislative context. Odisha’s move is not isolated but part of a coordinated effort among states to align with the four Labour Codes introduced by the Centre in 2020. These codes—on wages, social security, industrial relations, and occupational safety—were presented as historic simplifications of complex and archaic labour laws. Yet, the trade union movement has consistently criticized them for eroding collective bargaining rights, weakening protections against arbitrary dismissal, and diluting safety regulations. In this light, Odisha’s rule change is viewed not merely as a reform for gender equity, but as a testing ground for deeper, and possibly more controversial, labour reforms.

Proponents of the change argue that denying women the right to work night shifts is itself discriminatory. They maintain that with adequate safeguards, such employment can be a route to independence and empowerment. But detractors caution that laws on paper are not enough. Implementation remains the linchpin. Without rigorous inspections, complaint mechanisms, and responsive enforcement, women workers could find themselves more vulnerable than empowered.

In conclusion, the Odisha Factories (Amendment) Rules, 2025, mark a significant shift in how gender and labour are being redefined in India’s industrial policy. It brings to the fore a complex interplay of empowerment, economic necessity, institutional weakness, and ideological contestation. Whether this move will ultimately expand women’s agency or expose them to fresh forms of exploitation depends not just on the law itself, but on the structures of accountability that surround it. At a time when the nation is grappling with the unfinished project of labour reform, Odisha’s initiative throws light on the promises—and the perils—that lie ahead.

(The writer is a Service Union Representative and a Columnist. Mobile: 9437022669)

*****