Bruhaspati Samal
General Secretary
Confederation of Central
Govt. Employees and Workers
Odisha State Coordination Committee, Bhubaneswar
The Union Cabinet while approved a
new pension system in the name of Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) on 24th
August 2024 had declared for Assured Pension, Assured Family Pension and
Assured Minimum Pension. But the Official Gazette Notification issued in this
regard on 25th January 2025 has told about Assured Payout, Assured
Family Payout and Assured Minimum Payout.
The term ‘Pension’ is missing
under UPS. The retired employee may not be called as a pensioner since will not
get any Pension, but Payout. The Govt. may define another term for the retired
employees getting Payout. I think this is the beginning of a calculative process
to end the pension system for the employees in toto by the Central Govt. Earlier;
we have witnessed such hazardous consequences when the term ‘appointment’ was
replaced with ‘engagement’ for some categories of employees.
2. The Pension Committee as per the
Terms of Reference was constituted for bringing improvements in NPS.
Accordingly, Para-1 of the Gazette Notification has clarified that UPS is not a pension scheme but an option under National
Pension System. That means, one already under NPS may or may not exercise
his / her option for UPS.
3. Para - 2 (i) (c) while describing the eligibility states that
Assured Payout (50% of twelve monthly average basic pay immediately prior to
superannuation) in cases of voluntary retirement after 25 years of qualifying
service will commence from the date on which the employee would have
superannuated, if he had continued in service. It clearly means that if an employee,
who is supposed to serve, say for 35 years avails voluntary retirement just
after completing 25 years, there will be no Payout for 10 years. What a welfare
measure really it is! The family members including the retiree will have to starve
and wait for 10 years for getting the retirement benefit which we now call
Payout, not Pension.
4. The lump sum payment on
superannuation @10% of monthly emoluments for every completed six months of
qualifying service is very meagre (Para – 2 (6) & Illustrative Example – B in
the Annexure to the Notification.
5. Para – 2 (x) while providing investment
choices for the Individual Corpus (IC) alone states that in case of failure to
exercise an investment choice, the ‘default pattern’ of investment regulated by
PFRDA will apply which is confusing since not defined and thus will keep the
employees in dark.
6. The investment decision from Pool
Corpus (PC) which solely rests with the Central Govt. as per Para – 2 (xi) is quite
arbitrary and fraught with risk.
7. The existing beneficiaries under
NPS and the future employees can exercise option either to go with NPS or to
choose UPS once only during the entire service career (Para-3). Such option
once exercised shall be final. Matters relating to policy concession, policy
change, financial benefit etc. are forbidden in Para – 11 also. In the initial
stage when the pros and cons of UPS is not known to any one, closing of
reversal option is not at all a welfare measure.
8. The computation of ‘Benchmark
Corpus’ (BC) by PFRDA (Para – 5) may not be favourable for the employees opting
for UPS in case of missing contributions both from the employee and employer since
employees’ contribution is always taken care of by his DDO. The beneficiary may
be forced to suffer for no fault of his own.
9. Assured Payout is fully dependent
on IC, PC and BC (Para – 8 & 9). Thus, there is no guarantee that a retiree
under UPS will get the Assured Payout (50% of twelve
monthly average basic pay immediately prior to superannuation) even if he
retires with qualifying service of 25 years which has been made clear in Para –
10. The illustrative examples in the Annexure to the Notification clearly prove
it.
10. The proposed regulations to be
issued by PFRDA may clear many things more.
******
NB: These are my personal observations. Readers / Comrades are requested to guide me for any mistake committed by me, if any through the above analysis alongwith their opinions.
No comments:
Post a Comment